Accessibility navigation


Comprehension of wh-questions and declarative sentences in agrammatic aphasia: the set partition hypothesis

Salis, C. and Edwards, S. (2008) Comprehension of wh-questions and declarative sentences in agrammatic aphasia: the set partition hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21 (5). pp. 375-399. ISSN 0911-6044

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.11.001

Abstract/Summary

Problematic trace-antecedent relations between deep and surface structure have been a dominant theme in sentence comprehension in agrammatism. We challenge this view and propose that the comprehension in agrammatism in declarative sentences and wh-questions stems from impaired processing in logical form. We present new data from wh-questions and declarative sentences and advance a new hypothesis which we call the set partition hypothesis. We argue that elements that signal set partition operations influence sentence comprehension while trace-antecedent relations remain intact. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
ID Code:13880
Uncontrolled Keywords:agrammatism, aphasia, comprehension, wh-questions, declaratives, set, partition, BROCAS APHASICS, LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION, SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY, DEFICITS, TIME, DEPENDENCIES, DISSOCIATION, MORPHOLOGY, SUBJECT, ACCESS

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation