Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Idai simulations to cumulus parametrization schemes

Lists

Tools

Bopape, M.-J. M., Cardoso, H., Plant, R. S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-0022, Phaduli, E., Chikoore, H., Ndarana, T., Khalau, L. and Rakate, E. (2021) Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Idai simulations to cumulus parametrization schemes. Atmosphere, 12 (8). 932. ISSN 2073-4433

Preview

Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
1MB

Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.3390/atmos12080932

Abstract/Summary

Weather simulations are sensitive to subgrid processes, that are parameterized in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. In this study, we investigate the response of tropical cyclone Idai simulations to different cumulus parameterization schemes, using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with a 6 km grid length. Seventy-two hour (00 UTC 13 March to 00 UTC 16 March) simulations are conducted with the New Tiedtke (Tiedtke), New Simplified Arakawa Schubert (NewSAS), Multi-scale Kain Fritsch (MSKF), Grell-Freitas, and the Betts-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) schemes. A simulation for the same event is also conducted with the convection scheme switched off. The twenty-four hour accumulated rainfall during all three simulated days is generally similar across all six experiments. Larger differences in simulations are found for rainfall events away from the tropical cyclone. When the resolved and convective rainfall are partitioned, it is found that the scale-aware schemes (i.e. Grell-Freitas and MSKF) allow the model to resolve most of the rainfall, while they are less active. Regarding the maximum wind speed, and minimum sea level pressure (MSLP), the scale aware schemes simulate a higher intensity that is similar to the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) data set, however the timing is more aligned with the Global Forecast System (GFS), which is the model providing initial conditions and time dependent lateral boundary conditions. Simulations with the convection scheme off were found to be similar to those with the scale-aware schemes. It is found that Tiedtke simulates the location to be farther south west compared to other schemes, while BMJ simulates the path to be more to the north after landfall. All of the schemes as well as GFS failed to simulate the movement of Idai into Zimbabwe, showing potential impact of shortcomings in the forcing model. Our study shows that the use of scale aware schemes allows the model to resolve most of the dynamics, resulting in higher weather system intensity in the grey zone. The wrong timing of the peak shows a need to use better performing global models to provide lateral boundary conditions for downscalers.

Item Type:	Article
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:	99156
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Tropical cyclone Idai; cumulus parameterization; WRF model; flooding
Publisher:	MDPI

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Deposit Details

References

Houze, R.A.J. Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press 1994, p. 573. 487 2. Knight, D.; Davis, R. Contribution of tropical cyclones to extreme rainfall in the Southeastern United States. 488 Journal of Geophysical Research 2009, 114. doi:10.1029/2009JD012511. 489 3. Pillay, M.; Fitchett, J. Southern Hemisphere Tropical Cyclones: A Critical Analysis of Regional 490 Characteristics. International Journal of Climatology 2020, 41. doi:10.1002/joc.6613. 491 4. Mendelsohn, R.; Molua, E.; Akamin, A. Economic vulnerability to tropical storms on the southeastern 492 coast of Africa. Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 2020, 12, 2072–845. doi:10.4102/jamba.v12i1.676. 493 5. Chikoore, H.; Vermeulen, J.; Jury, M. Tropical cyclones in the Mozambique Channel: January–March 2012. 494 Natural Hazards 2015, 77. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1691-0. 495 6. Davis-Reddy, C.; Vincent, K.; CSIR, 2017. 496 7. Mavume, A.; Rydberg, L.; Rouault, M.; Lutjeharms, J. Climatology and Landfall of Tropical 497 Cyclones in the South- West Indian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 2010, 8. 498 doi:10.4314/wiojms.v8i1.56672. 499 8. Reason, C.J.C.; Keibel, A. Tropical Cyclone Eline and Its Unusual Penetration and Impacts 500 over the Southern African Mainland. Weather and Forecasting 01 Oct. 2004, 19, 789 – 805. 501 doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0789:TCEAIU>2.0.CO;2. 502 9. Moses, O.; Ramotonto, S. Assessing forecasting models on prediction of the tropical cyclone 503 Dineo and the associated rainfall over Botswana. Weather and Climate Extremes 2018, 21, 102–109. 504 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.07.004. 505 10. Mhlanga, C.; Muzingili, T.; Mpambela, M. Natural disasters in Zimbabwe: the primer for social work 506 intervention. African Journal of Social Work 2019, 9, 46–54. 507 11. Reunion, M.F.L. Past and Current hurricane system 2021. 508 12. Malherbe, J.; Engelbrecht, F.; Landman, W. Projected changes in tropical cyclone climatology and landfall 509 in the Southwest Indian Ocean region under enhanced anthropogenic forcing. Climate Dynamics 2013, 40. 510 doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1635-2. 511 13. Yu, P.; Johannessen, J.A.; Yan, X.H.; Geng, X.; Zhong, X.; Zhu, L. A Study of the Intensity of Tropical 512 Cyclone Idai Using Dual-Polarization Sentinel-1 Data. Remote Sensing 2019, 11. doi:10.3390/rs11232837. 513 14. Organization,W.M. Reducing vulnerability to extreme hydro-meteorological hazards in Mozambique after 514 Cyclone IDAI:WMO mission report following tropical cyclone IDAI. WMO 2019, p. 64. 515 15. Mongo, E.; Cambaza, E.; Nhambire, R.; Singo, J.; Machava, E., Outbreak of Cholera Due to Cyclone Idai in 516 Central Mozambique (2019); 2020; pp. 1–8. doi:10.5772/intechopen.89358. 517 16. Zimba, S.K.; Houane, M.J.; Chikova, A.M. Impact of Tropical Cyclone Idai on the Southern African Electric 518 Power Grid. 2020 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 2020, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/PowerAfrica49420.2020.9219944. 519 17. Charrua, A.B.; Padmanaban, R.; Cabral, P.; Bandeira, S.; Romeiras, M.M. Impacts of the Tropical Cyclone 520 Idai in Mozambique: A Multi-Temporal Landsat Satellite Imagery Analysis. Remote Sensing 2021, 13. 521 doi:10.3390/rs13020201. 522 18. Frieden, M. The aftermath of Cyclone Idai—building bridges where we can, 2019. Marthe Frieden is the 523 medical team leader in MSF’s emergency response to the destruction caused by tropical Cyclone Idai. On 524 the night of 15 March, the cyclone hit Zimbabwe’s mountainous Manicaland province, causing flooding 525 and deadly landslides, particularly in the Chimanimani District. Before Idai hit, Marthe was working on an 526 MSF pilot project for managing diabetes and hypertension in the nearby Chipinge District, in partnership 527 with Zimbabwe’s health ministry. Writing from the worst hit districts of Chimanimani and Chipinge, 528 Marthe describes the events of the first six days as an MSF team of 10 people rapidly switched from their 529 regular activities to emergency mode. 530 19. Chari, F.; Ngcamu, B.; Novukela, C. Supply chain risks in humanitarian relief operations: a case of 531 Cyclone Idai relief efforts in Zimbabwe. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 532 2020, 10, 320–361. doi:10.1108/JHLSCM-12-2019-0080. 533 20. Suarez, P. Linking Climate Knowledge and Decisions: Humanitarian Challenges 2009. 534 21. Bauer, P.; Thorpe, A.; Brunet, G. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature 2015, 535 525, 47–55. doi:10.1038/nature14956. Version June 27, 2021 submitted to Atmosphere 22 of 24 22. Dyson, 536 L.; Van Heerden, J. The heavy rainfall and floods over the northeastern interior of South Africa 537 during February 2000. South African Journal of Science 2001, 97, 80–86. 538 23. Stensrud, D. Parametrization schemes. Keys to understanding numerical weather prediction models. 539 Reprint of the 2007 hardback ed. Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather 540 Prediction Models 2007, p. 480. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812590. 541 24. Villafuerte II, M.; Lambrento, J.; Hodges, K.; Cruz, F.; Cinco, T.; Narisma, G. Sensitivity of tropical 542 cyclones to convective parameterization schemes in RegCM4. Climate Dynamics 2021, 56, 1–18. 543 doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05553-3. 544 25. Fuentes Franco, R.; Giorgi, F.; Coppola, E.; Zimmermann, K. Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to resolution, 545 convection scheme and ocean flux parameterization over Eastern Tropical Pacific and Tropical North 546 Atlantic Oceans in the RegCM4 model. Climate Dynamics 2017, 49. doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3357-3. 547 26. Lim, Y.K.; Schubert, S.D.; Reale, O.; Lee, M.I.; Molod, A.M.; Suarez, M.J. Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclones 548 to Parameterized Convection in the NASA GEOS-5 Model. Journal of Climate 15 Jan. 2015, 28, 551 – 573. 549 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00104.1. 550 27. Radhakrishnan, C.; Balaji, C. Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Jal simulations to physics parameterizations. 551 Journal of Earth System Science 2012, 121. doi:10.1007/s12040-012-0212-8. 552 28. Davis, C. Resolving Tropical Cyclone Intensity in Models. Geophysical Research Letters 2018, 45. 553 doi:10.1002/2017GL076966. 554 29. Steeneveld, G.J.; Peerlings, E. Mesoscale Model Simulation of a Severe Summer Thunderstorm in The 555 Netherlands: Performance and Uncertainty Assessment for Parameterised and Resolved Convection. 556 Atmosphere 2020, 11. doi:10.3390/atmos11080811. 557 30. Honnert, R.; Efstathiou, G.A.; Beare, R.J.; Ito, J.; Lock, A.; Neggers, R.; Plant, R.S.; 558 Shin, H.H.; Tomassini, L.; Zhou, B. The Atmospheric Boundary Layer and the âoeGray 559 Zoneâ ofÂ Turbulence: A Critical Review. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 560 2020, 125, e2019JD030317, [https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019JD030317]. 561 e2019JD030317 10.1029/2019JD030317, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030317. 562 31. Zheng, Y.; Alpaty, K.; Herwehe, J.A.; Del Genio, A.D.; Niyogi, D. Improving high-resolution weather 563 forecasts using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with an updated Kain-Fritsch scheme. 564 Mon. Weather Rev. 2016, 144, 833–860. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0005.1. 565 32. Grell, G.A.; Freitas, S.R. A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and 566 air quality modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 5233–5250. 567 33. Somses, S.; Bopape, M.J.M.; Ndarana, T.; Fridlind, A.; Matsui, T.; Phaduli, E.; Limbo, A.; Maikhudumu, S.; 568 Maisha, R.; Rakate, E. Convection parametrization and multi-nesting dependence of a heavy rainfall event 569 over Namibia with Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Climate 2020. 570 34. Champion, A.; Hodges, K. Importance of resolution and model configuration when downscaling extreme 571 precipitation. Tellus A 2014, 66. doi:10.3402/tellusa.v66.23993. 572 35. Skamarock,W.C.; Klemp, J.B.; Dudhia, J.; Gill, D.O.; Liu, Z.; Berner, J.; Huang, X.y. A Description of the 573 Advanced ResearchWRFModel Version 4 (No. NCAR/TN-556+STR). A description of the Advanced Research 574 WRF version 4 2008. 575 36. Powers, J.G.; Klemp, J.B.; Skamarock, W.C.; Davis, C.A.; Dudhia, J.; Gill, D.O.; Coen, J.L.; Gochis, D.J.; 576 Ahmadov, R.; Peckham, S.E.; Grell, G.A.;Michalakes, J.; Trahan, S.; Benjamin, S.G.; Alexander, C.R.; Dimego, 577 G.J.; Wang, W.; Schwartz, C.S.; Romine, G.S.; Liu, Z.; Snyder, C.; Chen, F.; Barlage, M.J.; Yu, W.; Duda, M.G. 578 The Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Overview, System Efforts, and Future Directions. Bulletin of 579 the American Meteorological Society 01 Aug. 2017, 98, 1717 – 1737. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00308.1. 580 37. Bopape, M.M.; Sithole, H.; Motshegwa, T.; Rakate, E.; Engelbrecht, F.; Morgan, A.; Ndimeni, L.; Botai, O.J. 581 A Regional Project in Support of the SADC Cyber-Infrastructure Framework Implementation: Weather 582 and Climate. Data Sci. J. 2019, 18, 34. doi:10.5334/dsj-2019-034. 583 38. Clark, P.; Roberts, N.; Lean, H.; Ballard, S.; Charlton-Perez, C. Convection-permitting models: A 584 step-change in rainfall forecasting. Meteorol Appl 2016, 23. doi:10.1002/met.1538. 585 39. Weisman, M.; Skamarock, W.; Klemp, J. The Resolution Dependence of Explicitly Modeled Convective 586 Systems. Mon Weather Rev 1997, 125. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0527:TRDOEM>2.0.CO;2. 587 40. Roberts, N. Assessing the spatial and temporal variation in the skill of precipitation forecasts from an 588 NWP model. Meteorol Appl 2008a, 15, 163 – 169. doi:10.1002/met.57. Version June 27, 2021 submitted to Atmosphere 23 of 24 589 41. Bryan, G.; Wyngaard, J.; Fritsch, J. Resolution Requirements for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection. 590 Mon. Weather Rev. 2003, 131. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2394:RRFTSO>2.0.CO;2. 591 42. J., S. Implementation of the sigma pressure hybrid coordinate into GFS. NCEP office Note 2009, 461, 1 – 25. 592 43. W.,W. WRF: More Runtime Options. WRF Tutorial, UNSW, Sydney, Australia 2017, p. 46. 593 44. Sun, B.Y.; Bi, X. Validation for a tropical belt version of WRF: sensitivity tests on radiation and 594 cumulus convection parameterizations. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters 2019, pp. 1–9. 595 doi:10.1080/16742834.2019.1590118. 596 45. Iacono, M.; Delamere, J.; Mlawer, E.; Shepard, M.; Clough, S.; Collins, W. Radiative Forcing by 597 Long-Lived Greenhouse Gases: Calculations with the AER Radiative Transfer Models. J. Geophys Res, 113. 598 doi:10.1029/2008JD009944. 599 46. Hong, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lim, J.o.; Dudhia, J. The WRF single moment microphysics scheme (WSM). Journal 600 of the Korean Meteorological Society 2006, 42, 129–151. 601 47. Hong, S.Y.; Noh, Y.; Dudhia, J. A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit 602 Treatment of Entrainment Processes. Monthly Weather Review 2006, 134, 2318–2341, 603 [https://journals.ametsoc.org/mwr/article-pdf/134/9/2318/4228453/mwr3199_1.pdf]. 604 doi:10.1175/MWR3199.1. 605 48. Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Hamilton, K. Improved Representation of Boundary Layer Clouds over the Southeast 606 Pacific in ARW-WRF Using a Modified Tiedtke Cumulus Parameterization Scheme. Mon Weather Rev 2011, 607 139, 3489–3513. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-10-05091.1. 608 49. Zhang, S.; Matsui, T.; Cheung, S.; Zupanski, M.; Peters-Lidard, C. Impact of Assimilated 609 Precipitation-Sensitive Radiances on the NU-WRF Simulation of the West African Monsoon. Mon Weather 610 Rev 2017, 145. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0389.1. 611 50. MA, T. A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme For Cumulus Parameterization In Large-Scale Models. Mon 612 Weather Rev 1989, 117. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2. 613 51. Han, J.; Pan, H.L. Revision of Convection and Vertical Diffusion Schemes in the NCEP Global Forecast 614 System. Weather and Forecasting 01 Aug. 2011, 26, 520 – 533. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-10-05038.1. 615 52. Pan, H.L.; Wu, W.S. Implementing a mass flux convective parameterization package for the NMC 616 Medium-Range Forecast model. NMC Office Note 409, 40pp 1995. 617 53. Kain, J.S.; Fritsch, J.M. A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in 618 convective parameterization., 1990. 619 54. Kain, J.S. The Kainâ“Fritsch convective parameterization: An update., 2004. 620 55. Arakawa, A.; Jung, J.H.; Wu, C.M. Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere. 621 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2011, 11, 3731–3742. doi:10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011. 622 56. Janjic´, Z.I. The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further Developments of the Convection, Viscous 623 Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure Schemes. Monthly Weather Review 01 May. 1994, 122, 927 – 945. 624 doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2. 625 57. Janjic´, Z.I. Comments on “Development and Evaluation of a Convection Scheme for Use 626 in Climate Models”. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 01 Nov. 2000, 57, 3686 – 3686. 627 doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3686:CODAEO>2.0.CO;2. 628 58. Betts, A.K. A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis. Quart. J. Roy. 629 Meteor. Soc. 1986, 112, 677–691. doi:10.1256/smsqj.47306. 630 59. Betts, A.K.; Miller, M.J. A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE 631 wave, BOMEX, ATEX and Arctic air-mass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 1986, 112, 693–709. 632 doi:10.1002/qj.49711247308. 633 60. Huffman, G.; Bolvin, D.; Braithwaite, D.; Hsu, K.; Joyce, R.; P., X. Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for 634 GPM (IMERG), version 4.4. NASA’s Precipitation Processing Center. NASA 2014. 635 61. Hersbach, H.; Dee, D. ERA5 reanalysis is in production. ECMWF 2016. 636 62. Jones, P. First- and Second-Order Conservative Remapping Schemes for Grids in Spherical Coordinates. 637 Monthly Weather Review 1999, 127, 2204–2210. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127. 638 63. Lean, H.W.; Clark, P.A.; Dixon, M.; Roberts, N.M.; Fitch, A.; Forbes, R.; Halliwell, C. Characteristics of 639 High-Resolution Versions of the Met Office Unified Model for Forecasting Convection over the United 640 Kingdom. Mon. Weather Rev. 2008, 136, 3408–3424. Version June 27, 2021 submitted to Atmosphere 24 of 24 641 64. Beusch, L.; Foresti, L.; Gabella, M.; Hamann, U. Satellite-Based Rainfall Retrieval: From Generalized Linear 642 Models to Artificial Neural Networks. Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 939. doi:10.3390/rs10060939. 643 65. Sharifi, E.; Eitzinger, J.; Dorigo, W. Performance of the State-Of-The-Art Gridded Precipitation 644 Products over Mountainous Terrain: A Regional Study over Austria. Remote Sensing 2019, 11. 645 doi:10.3390/rs11172018. 646 66. Beck, H.; Pan, M.; Roy, T.; Weedon, G.; Pappenberger, F.; van Dijk, A.; Huffman, G.; Adler, R.; Wood, E. 647 Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS. Hydrol. 648 Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 207–224. doi:10.5194/hess-23-207-2019. 649 67. Dezfuli, A.; Ichoku, C.; Huffman, G.; Mohr, K.; Selker, J.; van de Giesen, N.; Hochreutener, R.; 650 Annor, F. Validation of IMERG precipitation in Africa. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2017, 18. 651 doi:10.1175/JHM-D-17-0139.1. 652 68. Chu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Han, D. Evaluation of the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model 653 to reproduce a sub-daily extreme rainfall event in Beijing, China using different domain configurations and 654 spin-up times. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2018, 22, 3391–3407. doi:10.5194/hess-22-3391-2018. 655 69. Ma, L.M.; Tan, Z.M. Improving the behavior of the cumulus parameterization for 656 tropical cyclone prediction: Convection trigger. Atmospheric Research 2009, 92, 190–211. 657 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.022. 658 70. Shepherd, T.;Walsh, K. Sensitivity of hurricane track to cumulus parameterization schemes in theWRF 659 model for three intense tropical cyclones: Impact of convective asymmetry. Meteorology and Atmospheric 660 Physics 2017, 129. doi:10.1007/s00703-016-0472-y. 661 71. Bonekamp, P.N.J.; Collier, E.; Immerzeel,W.W. The Impact of Spatial Resolution, Land Use, and Spinup 662 Time on Resolving Spatial Precipitation Patterns in the Himalayas. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2018, 663 19, 1565 – 1581. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-17-0212.1. 664 72. Kanase, D.R.; Deshpande, M.; Phani, M.K.; Mukhopadhyay, P. Evaluation of convective parameterization 665 schemes in simulation of tropical cyclones by Climate Forecast System model: Version 2. Journal of Earth 666 System Science 2020, 129. doi:10.1007/s12040-020-01433-w. 667 73. Reddy, V.; Prasad, S.; Krishna, M.; Reddy, K. Effect of cumulus and microphysical parameterizations on 668 JAL cyclone prediction. Indian Journal of Radio and Space Physics 2014, 43, 103–123. 669 74. Fahad, A.A.; Tanvir, A. Impacts of different cumulus physics over south Asia region with case study 670 tropical cyclone Viyaru. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01481 2015, arXiv:1506.01481. 671 75. Biswas, M.; Bernardet, L.; Dudhia, J. Sensitivity of hurricane forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in 672 the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model. Geophysical Research Letters 2014, 41. 673 doi:10.1002/2014GL062071.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Idai simulations to cumulus parametrization schemes

Abstract/Summary

Downloads

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation