Accessibility navigation


Mastery of one’s domain is not the essence of management

Sinnicks, M. (2014) Mastery of one’s domain is not the essence of management. Business Ethics Journal Review, 2 (2). pp. 8-14. ISSN 2326-7526

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

99kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.12747/bejr2014.02.02

Abstract/Summary

I attempt to cast doubt on Beabout’s attempt to build on MacIntyre’s ethical theory by accounting for management as a ‘domain-relative’ practice for three reasons: i) we can partially engage in practices, so if management can be accounted a practice there is no need to invoke domain-relativity; ii) management does not seem to be domain-relative in the same way that other examples of domain-relative practices might be; and iii) practical wisdom, which Beabout sees as key to management as a domain-relative practice, is adequately covered by MacIntyre’s account of politics.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour
ID Code:99736
Publisher:Philosophy Documentation Center

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation