Accessibility navigation

Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97

Krebs, B. (2021) Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97. Journal of Criminal Law, 85 (3). pp. 232-235. ISSN 1740-5580

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/00220183211008679


This is a case note on R v Thacker [2021] EWCA Crim 97 considering whether the trial judge had erred in convicting 15 activists who had breached an airport perimeter fence of intentionally disrupting services, contrary to the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 s.1(2)(b). Issues discussed concern statutory interpretation, jury directions and the meaning of intent.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:100412


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation