Accessibility navigation

The human rights committee’s views in Sayadi v. Belgium: a missed opportunity

Milanovic, M. ORCID: (2009) The human rights committee’s views in Sayadi v. Belgium: a missed opportunity. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 1 (3). pp. 519-538. ISSN 1868-1581

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL:


The article provides a critical review of the Human Rights Committee's views in Sayadi v. Belgium, a case dealing with United Nations Security Council (UNSC) terrorist blacklists. The case raised many complex issues of international law, most notably the question whether UNSC resolutions can prevail over human rights treaties by virtue of Article 103 of the UN Charter. This issue – one of truly fundamental importance – has cropped up in several important recent cases which either addressed it or avoided it, including Kadi before the courts of the European Union, Al-Jedda before the UK House of Lords, and Behrami before the European Court of Human Rights. Regrettably, the Committee's decision did not do justice to the complexity and the gravity of the matters raised before it, as it failed to tackle the norm conflict issue head on and ignored the Charter's supremacy clause altogether. Such an approach advances neither the cause of human rights, nor the coherence of international law as a legal system.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
ID Code:108051
Publisher:University of Goettingen

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation