Misrecognition and responsibilisation in extreme events: towards recognition‐based accountability in academia

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Tekeste, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-0506 and Özbilgin, M. F. (2026) Misrecognition and responsibilisation in extreme events: towards recognition‐based accountability in academia. British Journal of Management, 37 (1). e70032. ISSN 1467-8551 doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.70032

Abstract/Summary

This essay interrogates how extreme events including the COVID‐19 pandemic, climate disasters, and political conflict, amplify structural inequalities in academia. Drawing on critical autoethnographic material from an Early Career Researcher with intersecting marginalisations, we show how crises expose and intensify two mutually reinforcing dynamics: misrecognition (institutional neglect of care responsibilities, political vulnerability, and embodied identity) and responsibilisation (the shifting of crisis management onto individuals). We demonstrate how these processes operate through institutional silence and performativity mechanisms that simultaneously erase vulnerability and demand uninterrupted performance, making individual adaptability appear both natural and necessary. By situating these lived experiences within Honneth's theory of recognition and Foucault's concept of responsibilisation, we theorise how their interaction deepens disadvantage for vulnerable groups during and after crises. In response, we propose Recognition‐based Accountability (RbA) as a framework for institutional reform. RbA shifts the emphasis from individual resilience to structural responsibility, outlining actionable, care‐oriented pathways for embedding equity and recognition into crisis governance in management education. This essay thus contributes to debates on academic inequality and the future of work by revealing the embodied costs of institutional neglect and offering a model for reorienting crisis response toward justice, care, and accountability.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128150
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.70032
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record