Integrating new land cover classes into ecological models to predict their biodiversity impacts

[thumbnail of Knight et al 2026.pdf]
Text
- Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Knight, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2423-7480, Breeze, T. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-8354, Girling, R. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-8075, Varah, A., Garratt, M. P.D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0196-6013, Hutchinson, L. A., Potts, S. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-980X, Smith, J., Staton, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0597-0121 and Gardner, E. (2026) Integrating new land cover classes into ecological models to predict their biodiversity impacts. Ecological Modelling, 514. 111489. ISSN 0304-3800 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111489

Abstract/Summary

As the need for sustainable agroecosystems gains recognition, new land cover classes are increasingly emerging in temperate landscapes. Process-based ecological models are often the most suitable initial option for predicting the biodiversity outcomes of such novel systems, particularly when implementation and large-scale baseline data remain scarce. However, there are no accepted guidelines for integrating new land covers into these models. Using UK silvoarable alley-cropping as a case study, we explore how to introduce this emerging land cover into the established process-based pollinator model, poll4pop. We demonstrate several parameterisation approaches, including proxy land covers, field data, expert opinion and Bayesian calibration. We also provide the first field-scale and seasonally-resolved evaluation of poll4pop, using pollinator abundance data collected at three UK silvoarable sites. Our results show that models using proxy land cover parameters can capture spatial trends in observed bee abundance where suitable proxies exist, but that predictions are improved by integrating field-derived floral cover. Neither bespoke, expert-derived, land cover attractiveness scores nor Bayesian-calibrated scores improved our model fit, although they did reveal valuable insights into model parameter sensitivity. Overall, poll4pop effectively reproduced observed fine-scale spatial variation in bumblebee and spring-flying solitary bee foraging activity in silvoarable systems. However, seasonal differences between communities resulted in reduced model-predictive performance for summer-flying solitary bees. We demonstrate that poll4pop is suitable for modelling fine-scale pollinator abundance in complex mixed-cropping systems. We also present a practical framework for integrating new land cover classes into process-based models which can guide future modelling of emerging land use systems.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/130674
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111489
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record