Calibration of the MEMS v1 model over a continental soil inventory: a comparison of MCMC and 4DEnVar methods

Viskari, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-1374, Quaife, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-4613, Fahl, F., Zhang, Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2669-1378 and Lugato, E. (2026) Calibration of the MEMS v1 model over a continental soil inventory: a comparison of MCMC and 4DEnVar methods. Geoscientific Model Development, 19 (13). pp. 6079-6098. ISSN 1991-9603 doi: 10.5194/gmd-19-6079-2026

Abstract/Summary

An abundant amount of different data is required to calibrate soil organic carbon (SOC) models to represent ecosystems at large-scale. However, due to challenges related to model state projections, this calibration becomes very computationally heavy with traditional calibration methods. Here, we test 4-Dimensional Ensemble Variational data assimilation (4DEnVar) method to parameterize the MEMS v1 SOC model using data from the LUCAS network and compare its performance against MCMC calibration. Additionally, we performed an experiment where we adjusted the litter input calculation to see if the two calibration methods react differently to the change. The total SOC projections from both parameterizations showed similar improvements though the produced parameter sets differed. A thorough analysis revealed that the detailed SOC states differed from each other, but we also lacked information to determine which parameter set was closer to the truth. Furthermore, changing the litter input partition highlighted how much that assumption affects the calibration results with both methods. Our results here establish 4DEnVar as an applicable calibration method for SOC models but also highlight the need for more nuanced validation methods, as well as careful examination on how different data sets affect the model calibration.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/130947
Identification Number/DOI	10.5194/gmd-19-6079-2026
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO) Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher	Copernicus
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item