Stop using root-mean-square error as a precipitation target!

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
[thumbnail of tweedie.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hunt, K. M. R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-3755 (2026) Stop using root-mean-square error as a precipitation target! Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems. ISSN 2769-7525 doi: 10.1175/AIES-D-25-0083.1

Abstract/Summary

Root-mean-square error (RMSE) remains the default training loss for data-driven precipitation models, despite precipitation being semi-continuous, zero-inflated, strictly non-negative, and heavy-tailed. This Gaussian-implied objective misspecifies the data-generating process because it tolerates negative predictions, underpenalises rare heavy events, and ignores the mass at zero. We suggest replacing RMSE with the Tweedie deviance, a likelihood-based and differentiable loss from the exponential–dispersion family, with variance function V(μ) = μᵖ. For 1 < p < 2, it yields a compound Poisson–Gamma distribution with a point mass at zero and a continuous density over y > 0, matching observed precipitation characteristics. In this paper, we (i) estimate p from the variance–mean power law and show that precipitation across temporal aggregations is far from Gaussian and that the Tweedie power p increases with accumulation length towards a Gamma limit; and (ii) demonstrate consistent skill gains when training deep data-driven models with Tweedie deviance instead of RMSE. In diffusion-model downscaling over Beijing, Tweedie loss improves wet-pixel MAE and extreme recall (∼0.611 vs 0.566 at the 99th percentile). In ConvLSTM nowcasting over Kolkata, Tweedie loss yields improvements in wet-pixel MAE and dry-pixel hit rates, with improvements autoregressively compounding over lead time (for MAE, 3.5% at t+1 growing to 8.7% at t+4). Extreme recall at the 99.9th percentile is not significantly higher at t+1 but becomes significantly higher by t+3 and t+4. Because the Tweedie deviance is continuous in p, it adapts smoothly across scales, offering a statistically justified, practical replacement for RMSE in precipitation-based learning tasks.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/131168
Identification Number/DOI 10.1175/AIES-D-25-0083.1
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > NCAS
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher American Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record