Overcoming two lacunae in Nietzsche’s story of the “Slave Revolt”

[thumbnail of Richard J Elliott - Overcoming Two Lacunae - JNS 2026.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 December 2026.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Elliott, R. (2025) Overcoming two lacunae in Nietzsche’s story of the “Slave Revolt”. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 56 (2). pp. 167-192. ISSN 1538-4594 doi: 10.5325/jnietstud.56.2.0167

Abstract/Summary

This article addresses two perceived lacunae arising from Nietzsche’s famous “slave revolt” in morality. The first concerns the dominant interpretation of Nietzsche’s narrative in the Genealogy (GM), that on his own considered model of agency, there is no “doer” behind the “deed”; rather, the “the doing is everything.” This article gives reasons to think this interpretation is incorrect. The relevant passage (GM I:13) offers a stylistic flourish to elucidate a view of agency belonging to the warrior-nobles. The second concerns why these warrior-nobles come to assent to “slavish” values at all. Exploring Nietzsche’s functional claims about power, this article demonstrates another normative sphere at some level recognized and revered by the warrior-nobles, which allows them to consider the priests as rivals. Priestly spirituality, as an alternative mode of empowerment, tracks different conceptions of value.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/131177
Identification Number/DOI 10.5325/jnietstud.56.2.0167
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Penn State University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record