Recontextualisation of SFL Appraisal analysis in the teaching of doctoral conclusion writing: The role of Attitude and Graduation in positively evaluating research contribution

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Whiteside, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-1085 and Yakovchuk, N. (2026) Recontextualisation of SFL Appraisal analysis in the teaching of doctoral conclusion writing: The role of Attitude and Graduation in positively evaluating research contribution. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 82. 101705. ISSN 1475-1585 doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101705

Abstract/Summary

This study investigates how doctoral writers across disciplines linguistically realise positive evaluation of their research contributions in thesis conclusions. Drawing on the Appraisal system within Systemic Functional Linguistics (Martin & White, 2005), we analyse instances of Move 2, Evaluating the study, Step 1, Indicating significance (Yang & Allison, 2003; Loi et al., 2016) in a corpus of Politics and International Relations, Psychology, and Computer Science theses from two UK universities. We identify patterns in the use of resources for inscribed Attitude and Attitude evoked via the Force and Focus categories of Graduation, and compare our findings with the representation of evaluative language for this purpose in published pedagogic resources, concluding that both the rhetorical purpose and its linguistic realisation are currently to a large extent neglected. We discuss both implications for doctoral writing practitioners, including detailing a possible pedagogic intervention informed by our data, and implications with regard to the 'Applied Linguistics' vs. 'Applied-ness' debate.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/131439
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101705
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Global Academy
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record