Meson properties in an extended nonlocal NJL model
Plant, R. S. Full text not archived in this repository. It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Abstract/SummaryA nonlocal version of the NJL model is investigated. It is based on a separable quark-quark interaction, as suggested by the instanton liquid picture of the QCD vacuum. The interaction is extended to include terms that bind vector and axial-vector mesons. The nonlocality means that no further regulator is required. Moreover the model is able to confine the quarks by generating a quark propagator without poles at real energies. Features of the continuation of amplitudes from Euclidean space to Minkowski energies are discussed. These features lead to restrictions on the model parameters as well as on the range of applicability of the model. Conserved currents are constructed, and their consistency with various Ward identities is demonstrated. In particular, the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation is derived both in the ladder approximation and at meson loop level. The importance of maintaining chiral symmetry in the calculations is stressed throughout. Calculations with the model are performed to all orders in momentum. Meson masses are determined, along with their strong and electromagnetic decay amplitudes. Also calculated are the electromagnetic form factor of the pion and form factors associated with the processes gamma gamma* --> pi0 and omega --> pi0 gamma*. The results are found to lead to a satisfactory phenomenology and demonstrate a possible dynamical origin for vector-meson dominance. In addition, the results produced at meson loop level validate the use of 1/Nc as an expansion parameter and indicate that a light and broad scalar state is inherent in models of the NJL type.
[1] W. Marciano and H. Pagels, Phys. Rep. 36 (1978) 137.
[2] G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461.
[3] M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385,
448, 519; J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rep. 87 (1982) 77; L. J. Reinders,
H. Rubenstein and S. Yazaki, Phys. Rep. 127 (1986) 1.
[4] M. Creutz, Quarks, gluons and lattices, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1983).
[5] C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33 (1994) 477.
[6] R. Delbourgo and M. D. Scadron, J. Phys. G5 (1979) 1621; P. Maris, C. D.
Roberts and P. C. Tandy, nucl-th/9707003 (1997).
[7] Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345; 124 (1961) 246.
[8] R. D. Bowler and M. C. Birse, Nucl. Phys. A582 (1995) 655.
[9] A. Bramon, A. Grau and G. Pancheri, Phys. Lett. B317 (1993) 190.
[10] S. I. Eidelman, Z. K. Silagadze and E. A. Kuraev, Phys. Lett. B346 (1995) 186.
[11] D. Prashar, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 1183.
[12] Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 1.
209
References 210
[13] J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich and B. R. Holstein, Dynamics of the standard model,
(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
[14] M. Gell-Mann and M. L evy, Nuovo Cim. 16 (1960) 705.
[15] H. Georgi, Weak interactions and modern particle theory, (Benjamin/Cummings,
California, 1984).
[16] M. Gell-Mann, R. Oakes and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175 (1968) 2195.
[17] V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Furlan and C. Rossetti, Currents in hadron physics,
(North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).
[18] R. Machleidt, K. Holinde and Ch. Elster, Phys. Rep. 149 (1987) 1.q
[19] M. J. Iqbal, X. Jin and D. B. Leinweber, Phys. Lett. B367 (1996) 45; H. B.
O'Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas and A. G. Williams, hep-ph/9501251
(1995); T. Hatsuda, E. M. Henley, Th. Meissner and G. Krein, Phys. Rev. C49
(1994) 452; K. L. Mitchell, P. C. Tandy, C. D. Roberts and R. T. Cahill, Phys.
Lett. B335 (1994) 282; J. Piekarewicz and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. C47
(1993) R2462; L. C. L. Hollenberg, C. D. Roberts and B. H. J. McKellar, Phys.
Rev. C46 (1992) 2057.
[20] P. G. Blunden and M. J. Iqbal, Phys. Lett. B198 (1987) 14; S. A. Coon and R.
C. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C36 (1987) 2189.
[21] G. A. Miller, B. M. K. Nefkens and I. Slaus, Phys. Rep. 194 (1990) 1.
[22] R. Enomoto and M. Tanabashi, hep-ph/9706340 (1997).
[23] Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 1366.
[24] J. L. Gammel and R. M. Thaler, Phys. Rev. 107 (1957) 291.
[25] G. Breit, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 46 (1960) 746.
References
References 211
[26] J. J. Sakurai, Ann. Phys. 11 (1960) 1.
[27] G. Breit, Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) 287; J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. 119 (1960) 1784.
[28] W. R. Frazer and J. R. Fulco, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 1609.
[29] L. M. Barkov et al., Nucl. Phys. B256 (1985) 365; I. B. Vasserman et al., Sov. J.
Nucl. Phys. 33 (1981) 709; L. M. Barkov et al., Novosibirsk preprint INP 79{69
(1979); G. Cosme et al., ORSAY preprint LAL{1287 (1976); A. Quenzer et al.,
Phys. Lett. B76 (1978) 512; S. R. Amendolia et al., Phys. Lett. B138 (1984)
454.
[30] L. G. Landsberg, Phys. Rep. 128 (1985) 301.
[31] M. Gell-Mann, D. Sharp and W. G. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8 (1962) 261; J.
W. Durso, Phys. Lett. B184 (1987) 348.
[32] D. W. G. S. Leith, Electromagnetic interactions of hadrons Volume 1 (ed. A.
Donnachie and G. Shaw, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1978).
[33] N. M. Kroll, T. D. Lee and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 157 (1967) 1376.
[34] M. Gell-Mann and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 953.
[35] G. H�ohler and E. Pietarinen, Nucl. Phys. B95 (1975) 210; W. Grein, Nucl. Phys.
B131 (1977) 255.
[36] U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27 (1991) 195; S. P. Klevansky,
Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 649; T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247
(1994) 221.
[37] J. Bijnens, Phys. Rep. 265 (1996) 369.
[38] V. A. Miransky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 1641.
[39] J. Bijnens, E. de Rafael and H. Zheng, Z. Phys. C62 (1994) 437.
References
References 212
[40] J. Bijnens and J. Prades, Phys. Lett. B320 (1994) 130; Z. Phys. C64 (1994) 475.
[41] T. Meissner, E. Ruiz Arriola and K. Goeke, Z. Phys. A336 (1990) 91.
[42] R. S. Willey, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 2877; T. Gherghetta, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994)
5985.
[43] E. Nikolov, W. Broniowski, C. V. Christov, G. Ripka and K. Goeke, Nucl. Phys.
A608 (1996) 411.
[44] V. Dmitra sinovi c, H.-J. Schulze, R. Tegen and R. H. Lemmer, Ann. Phys. 234
(1994) 225.
[45] E. Pallante, Z. Phys. C75 (1997) 305.
[46] C. Sch�uren, F. D�oring, E. Ruiz Arriola and K. Goeke, Nucl. Phys. A565 (1993)
687.
[47] R. Alkofer, H. Reinhardt, H. Weigel and U. Zuckert, Phys. Lett. B298 (1992) 132;
U. Zuckert, R. Alkofer, H. Reinhardt and H. Weigel, Nucl. Phys. A570 (1994)
445.
[48] E. Ruiz Arriola and L. L. Salcedo, Phys. Lett. B316 (1993) 148; Nucl. Phys.
A590 (1995) 703.
[49] I. J. R. Aitchison and G. Ripka, Nucl. Phys. A606 (1996) 292.
[50] R. Alkofer and P. A. Amundsen, Nucl. Phys. B306 (1988) 305; A. A. Bel'kov,
D. Ebert and A. V. Emelyaneko, Nucl. Phys. A552 (1993) 523; K. Langfeld, C.
Kettner and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. A608 (1996) 331; T. Hamazaki and T.
Kugo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 92 (1994) 645.
[51] D. I. Dyakonov and V. Yu. Petrov, Nucl. Phys. B245 (1984) 259; Sov. Phys.
JETP 62 (1985) 204, 431; Nucl. Phys. B272 (1986) 457.
[52] G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 8; Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 3432.
References
References 213
[53] M. A. Novak, J. J. M. Verbaarschat and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B228 (1989) 251.
[54] H. Ito, W. W. Buck and F. Gross, Phys. Lett. B248 (1990) 28.
[55] H. Ito, W. W. Buck and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C43 (1991) 2483.
[56] H. Ito, W. W. Buck and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C45 (1992) 1918.
[57] S. Schmidt, D. Blaschke and Y. L. Klavinovsky, Phys. Rev. C50 (1994) 435.
[58] G. V. E
mov and M. A. Ivanov, The Quark Con
nement Model of Hadrons (IOP,
Bristol and Philadelphia, 1993).
[59] G. V. E
mov and S. N. Nedelko, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 176; Ja. V. Burdanov,
G. V. E
mov, S. N. Nedelko and S. A. Solunin, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 4483.
[60] K. Lang
eld and M. Rho, Nucl. Phys. A596 (1996) 451.
[61] H. Reinhardt, Phys. Lett. B257 (1991) 375; K. Langfeld and M. Schaden, Phys.
Lett. B272 (1991) 100; K. Langfeld, R. Alkofer and H. Reinhardt, Phys. Lett.
B277 (1992) 163.
[62] P. T. Cahill and C. D. Roberts Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2419; J. Praschifka, C. D.
Roberts and R. T. Cahill, Phys. Rev. D36 (1987) 209.
[63] M. R. Frank and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C53 (1996) 390.
[64] M. Buballa and S. Krewald, Phys. Lett. B294 (1992) 19.
[65] V. Bernard and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A489 (1988) 647.
[66] M. Wakamatsu and W. Weise, Z. Phys. A331 (1988) 173; D. Ebert and H.
Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B271 (1986) 188; J. Bijnens, C. Bruno and E. de Rafael,
Nucl. Phys. B390 (1993) 501; E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 430.
[67] J. Prades, Z. Phys. C63 (1994) 491.
References
References 214
[68] S. Klimt, M. Lutz, U. Vogl and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A516 (1990) 429, 469.
[69] V. Bernard, R. L. Ja
e and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. B308 (1988) 753.
[70] M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 (1970) 1422; M. Kobayashi,
H. Kondo and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 45 (1971) 1955.
[71] J. W. Negele, hep/lat 9709129 (1997).
[72] G. C. Wick, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 1124.
[73] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B160 (1979) 57.
[74] C. J. Burden, C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Phys. Lett. B285 (1992) 347.
[75] M. Stingl, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 3863; D36 (1987) 651 (E); U. H�abel, R.
K�onning, H.-G. Reusch, M. Stingl and S. Wigard, Z. Phys. A336 (1990) 435.
[76] C. Savkli and F. Tabakin, hep-ph/9702251 (1997).
[77] T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9 (1969) 209.
[78] R. E. Cutkosky, P. V. Landsho
, D. I. Olive and J. C. Polkinghorne, Nucl. Phys.
B12 (1969) 281.
[79] M. Bando, M. Harada and T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91 (1994) 927.
[80] J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, J. Comput. 7 (1965) 308.
[81] T. W. Sag and G. Szekeres, Math. Comput. 18 (1964) 245.
[82] W. Broniowski, G. Ripka, E. Nikolov and K. Goeke, Z. Phys. A354 (1996) 421.
[83] M. Goldberger and S. Treiman, Phys. Rev. 110 (1958) 1178, 1478.
[84] M. R. Frank, Phys. Rev. C51 (1995) 987.
References
References 215
[85] C. D. Roberts, Nucl. Phys. A605 (1996) 475; C. J. Burden, C. D. Roberts and
M. J. Thompson, Phys. Lett. B371 (1996) 163; P. C. Tandy, Prog. Part. Nucl.
Phys. 36 (1996) 97; R. Alkofer, A. Bender and C. D. Roberts, Int. J. Mod. Phys.
A10 (1995) 3319; C. D. Roberts, R. T. Cahill, M. E. Sevior and N. Iannella,
Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 125.
[86] D. Kekez and D. Klabu car, Phys. Lett. B387 (1996) 14.
[87] M. R. Frank, K. L. Mitchell, C. D. Roberts and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Lett. B359
(1995) 17.
[88] J. Ball and T. Chiu, Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 2542.
[89] K. L. Au, D. Morgan and M. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 1633; D. Morgan
and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 1185.
[90] S. Ishida, M. Y. Ishida, H. Takahashi, T. Ishida, K. Takamatsu and T. Tsuru,
Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996) 745; B. S. Zou and D. V. Bugg, Phys. Rev. D50
(1994) 591; N. A. Tornqvist and M. Roos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 1575; M.
Harada, F. Sannino and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 1991.
[91] C. J. Burden, L. Qian, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy and M. J. Thomson, Austr.
J. Phys. 50 (1997) 95.
[92] V. Bernard, A. H. Blin, B. Hiller, U.-G. Meissner and M. C. Ruivo, Phys. Lett.
B305 (1993) 163.
[93] A. Polleri, R. A. Broglia, P. M. Pizzochero and N. N. Scoccola, hep/ph 9611300
(1996).
[94] A. N. Ivanov, M. Nagy and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B200 (1988) 171.
[95] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1177.
[96] V. Bernard, A. A. Osipov and U.-G, Meissner, Phys. Lett. B292 (1992) 205.
References
References 216
[97] M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Nucl. Phys. B259 (1985) 493; M. Bando,
T. Fujiwara and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79 (1988) 1140.
[98] H. Albrecht et al., Z. Phys. C58 (1993) 61.
[99] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 507.
[100] M. Goldberger, D. Soper and A. Guth, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 1117.
[101] S. R. Amendolia et al., Nucl. Phys. B277 (1986) 168.
[102] C. N. Brown et al., Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 92; C. J. Bebek et al., Phys. Rev. D9
(1974) 1229.
[103] V. Bernard and U.-G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2296.
[104] C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum
eld theory (McGraw-Hill 1980).
[105] H.-J. Behrend et al., Z. Phys. C49 (1991) 401.
[106] J. Gronberg et al., CLEO collaboration, preprint CLNS 97/1477 / CLEO 97-7
(1997).
[107] S. I. Eidelman, The DA NE Physics Handbook, eds. L. Maiani, G. Pancheri and
N. Paver (INFN, Frascati, 1995), p. 499.
[108] R. I. Dzhelyadin et al., Phys. Lett. B102 (1981) 296.
[109] M. Bando and M. Harada, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 6096; G. K�opp, Phys. Rev.
D10 (1974) 932.
[110] F. Klingl, N. Kaiser and W. Weise, hep/ph 9607431 (1996).
[111] M. Zielinski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1195.
[112] E. Quack and S. P. Klevansky, Phys. Rev. C49 (1994) 3283.
References
References 217
[113] N.-W. Cao, C. M. Shakin and W.-D. Sun, Phys. Rev. C46 (1992) 2535; P. P.
Domitrovich, D. B�uckers and H. M�uther, Phys. Rev. C48 (1993) 413; P. Zhuang,
J. H�ufner and S. P. Klevansky, Nucl. Phys. A576 (1994) 525; P. Zhuang, J.
H�ufner, S. P. Klevansky and H. Voss, Ann. Phys. 234 (1994) 225; Y. B. He, J.
H�ufner, S. P. Klevansky and P. Rehberg, nucl-th 9712051 (1997).
[114] R. D. Bowler, PhD thesis, University of Manchester (1995).
[115] M. C. Birse, private communication.
[116] V. Elias, A. H. Fariborz, Fang Shi and T. G. Steele, hep-ph 9708466 (1997).
[117] M. Svec, hep-ph 9711376 (1997); J. A. Oller and E. Oset, hep-ph 9710554 (1997);
R. Kami nski, L. Le sniak and B. Loiseau, hep-ph 9712337 (1997).
[118] M. R. Pennington, hep-ph 9710456 (1997).
[119] M. Ishida, S. Ishida and T. Ishida, hep-ph 9802272 (1998).
[120] S. Ishida, hep-ph 9712229 (1997); K. Takamatsu, M. Ishida, S. Ishida, T. Ishida
and T. Tsuru, hep-ph 9712232 (1997).
[121] M. C. Birse, J. Phys. G20 (1994) 1537.
[122] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 188.
[123] L. S. Brown, Phys. Rev. 163 (1967) 1802.
[124] B. W. Lee and H. T. Nieh, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1507.
[125] S. Weinberg, Physica A96 (1979) 327.
[126] J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. B158 (1984) 142.
[127] J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 465.
[128] H. W. Fearing and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 315.
References
References 218
[129] S. Bellucci, J. Gasser and M. Sainio, Nucl. Phys. B423 (1994) 80; Nucl. Phys.
B431 (1994) 413 (E); M. Jetter, Nucl. Phys. B459 (1996) 283; J. Bijnens, G.
Colangelo, G. Ecker, J. Gasser and M. E. Sainio, hep-ph/9707291 (1997).
[130] J. Donoghue, C. Ramirez and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 1947.
[131] G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B321 (1989) 311.
[132] M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki and T. Yangida, Phys. Rev. Lett.
54 (1985) 1215; M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. 164 (1988)
217.
[133] S. Gasiorowicz and D. A. Ge
en, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41 (1969) 531.
[134] S. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239; C. G. Callan,
S. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, ibid 2247.
[135] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1568.
[136] G. Ecker, H. Leutwyler, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B223
(1989) 425.
[137] U.-G. Meissner, Phys. Rep. 161 (1988) 213.
[138] M. C. Birse, Z. Phys. A355 (1996) 231.
[139] K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 412; J. Bijnens and E. Pallante, Mod.
Phys. Lett. A11 (1996) 1069.
[140] M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73 (1985) 1541.
[141] T. Fujiwara, T. Kugo, H. Terao, S. Uehara and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor.
Phys. 73 (1985) 1541.
[142] J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95.
[143] S. Furui, R. Kobayashi and K. Ujiie, Prog. Theor. Phys. 76 (1986) 963.
[144] K. Kawarabayashi and M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 (1966) 255; Riazuddin
and Fayyazuddin, Phys. Rev. 147 (1966) 1071.
[145] H. Gomm, �
O. Kaymakcalan and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 2345.
[146] M. F. L. Gotterman and N. D. Hari Dass, Nucl. Phys. B272 (1986) 739.
[147] �
O. Kaymakcalan, S. Rajeev and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 594.
[148] W. A. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1848.
[149] Y. Brihaye, N. K. Pak and P. Rossi, Nucl. Phys. B254 (1985) 71; Phys. Lett.
B164 (1985) 111.
[150] E. A. Kuraev and Z. K. Silagadze, Phys. Lett. B292 (1992) 377.
[151] D. Kalafatis, Phys. Lett. B313 115; D. Kalafatis and M. C. Birse, Nucl. Phys.
A584 589.
[152] S. I. Dolinsky et al., Phys. Rep. 202 (1991) 99.
[153] G. Pancheri, Nuovo Cim. A107 (1994) 2149.
[154] L. M. Kurdadze et al., JETP Lett. 47 (1988) 512.
[155] V. M. Aulchenko et al., Novosibirsk preprint YAF 87-90 (1987).
[156] R. Kumar, Phys. Rev. 185 (1969) 1865.
References
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
University of Reading
CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading
Accessibility navigation
Meson properties in an extended nonlocal NJL model
Plant, R. S. Full text not archived in this repository. It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Abstract/SummaryA nonlocal version of the NJL model is investigated. It is based on a separable quark-quark interaction, as suggested by the instanton liquid picture of the QCD vacuum. The interaction is extended to include terms that bind vector and axial-vector mesons. The nonlocality means that no further regulator is required. Moreover the model is able to confine the quarks by generating a quark propagator without poles at real energies. Features of the continuation of amplitudes from Euclidean space to Minkowski energies are discussed. These features lead to restrictions on the model parameters as well as on the range of applicability of the model. Conserved currents are constructed, and their consistency with various Ward identities is demonstrated. In particular, the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation is derived both in the ladder approximation and at meson loop level. The importance of maintaining chiral symmetry in the calculations is stressed throughout. Calculations with the model are performed to all orders in momentum. Meson masses are determined, along with their strong and electromagnetic decay amplitudes. Also calculated are the electromagnetic form factor of the pion and form factors associated with the processes gamma gamma* --> pi0 and omega --> pi0 gamma*. The results are found to lead to a satisfactory phenomenology and demonstrate a possible dynamical origin for vector-meson dominance. In addition, the results produced at meson loop level validate the use of 1/Nc as an expansion parameter and indicate that a light and broad scalar state is inherent in models of the NJL type.
Related URLs Deposit Details References University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
Lists
Lists
