The prevention of infiltration (amendment no. 4) bill: a malevolent response to the Israeli Supreme Court judgment
Ziegler, R. Full text not archived in this repository. It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Official URL: http://migreflaw.wordpress.com/2013/12/04/the-prev... Abstract/SummaryThe blog-post critically analyses the (at the time proposed) Prevention of Infiltration bill (Amendment no. 4), following the quashing by the Israeli Supreme Court of Amendment no. 3 (in HCJ 7146/12 Adam v. the Knesset et al). It is contended that the legislation is more draconian than its quashed predecessor considering (a) the virtual halt in new entrants (b) the explicit recognition of the non-deportability of prospective detainees (c) the pretence of referring to the detention centre as ‘open’ (d) the absence of judicial oversight.
Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
Lists
Lists
