Accessibility navigation


Art, value and function

Schroeder, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-6458 (2013) Art, value and function. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 23 (46). pp. 47-62. ISSN 2000-9607

[img] Text
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

120kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/nja/artic...

Abstract/Summary

Is the concept of a work of art an evaluative concept: does its application imply a positive evaluation? I shall discuss this question by considering two opposing attempts at defining art, namely the Institutional Theory and the view that art is a functional concept. I shall argue that the concept of art does not imply an unconditionally positive evaluation, but that art is a prestige concept. Moreover, it will be shown that functional definitions of art are flawed.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
ID Code:39610
Uncontrolled Keywords:The concept of art, institutional theory of art, functional definition of art
Publisher:The Nordic Society of Aesthetics

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation