Accessibility navigation


Employment relations and social stratification in contemporary urban China: does Goldthorpe’s class theory still work?

Zou, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-1489 (2015) Employment relations and social stratification in contemporary urban China: does Goldthorpe’s class theory still work? Sociology, 49 (6). pp. 1133-1150. ISSN 0038-0385

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

338kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/0038038514562853

Abstract/Summary

Goldthorpe’s class theory suggests that social class arises from employment relations in industrialised societies. This article assesses whether class in urban China can be approached from the same perspective by addressing three issues: 1) whether employment relations can capture China’s class structure, 2) how differently class is shaped by occupational structure in China, and 3) how useful class is to help us understand income inequality. Based on a recent Chinese social survey, the analysis finds three clusters of Chinese employees that fit into the ‘service’, ‘intermediate’ and ‘labour contract’ class typologies suggested by Goldthorpe’s class theory. Also, there is evidence that class links to occupational structures in a similar way between Chinese and Western societies. Finally class, when directly measured from employment relations, displays a reasonable degree of explanatory power for inter-class income inequality whereas the Goldthorpe class classification fails to differentiate between intermediate and labour class positions.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
ID Code:82777
Publisher:British Sociological Association

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation