Accessibility navigation


Barriers to “industrialisation” for interwar British retailing? The case of Marks & Spencer Ltd.

Scott, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9040 and Walker, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-0236 (2017) Barriers to “industrialisation” for interwar British retailing? The case of Marks & Spencer Ltd. Business History, 59 (2). pp. 179-201. ISSN 1743-7938

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2016.1156088

Abstract/Summary

Research on international differences in retail productivity has highlighted formidable environmental barriers to the ‘industrialisation’ of mass retailing as a driver of declining British interwar productivity growth in this sector (and in services more generally). We examine evidence for such barriers, using a case study of a firm that built its interwar expansion strategy on ‘American’ retail methods – Marks & Spencer (M&S). We find that, rather than facing barriers to the adoption of American mass retail practices, M&S reaped major productivity gains from this process. This adds further evidence to an emerging literature rejecting the barriers to industrialisation thesis for retailing.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
ID Code:62836
Publisher:Taylor & Francis

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation