Accessibility navigation

Underwhelming supervening acts: R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450 (30/03/2021)

Lists
Tools

Krebs, B. (2021) Underwhelming supervening acts: R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450 (30/03/2021). The Journal of Criminal Law, 85 (5). pp. 403-405. ISSN 0022-0183

[img]
Preview
 Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
133kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/00220183211044289

Abstract/Summary

This is a case note on R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450. It considers the concept of ‘overwhelming supervening acts’ (OSA) and its relationship to the ‘fundamental difference rule’ (FDR).

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:100414
Publisher:Sage
Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric
Deposit Details

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation

See also