Exposing the myth of the 1:5:200 ratio relating initial cost, maintenance and staffing costs of office buildings
Hughes, W. P., Ancell, D., Gruneberg, S. and Hirst, L. (2004) Exposing the myth of the 1:5:200 ratio relating initial cost, maintenance and staffing costs of office buildings. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, pp. 373-381.
In an attempt to focus clients' minds on the importance of considering the construction and maintenance costs of a commercial office building (both as a factor in staff productivity and as a fraction of lifetime staff costs) there is an often-quoted ratio of costs of 1:5:200, where for every one pound spent on construction cost, five are spent on maintenance and building operating costs and 200 on staffing and business operating costs. This seems to stem from a paper published by the Royal Academy of Engineering, in which no data is given and no derivation or defence of the ratio appears. The accompanying belief that higher quality design and construction increases staff productivity, and simultaneously reduces maintenance costs, how ever laudable, appears unsupported by research, and carries all the hallmarks of an "urban myth". In tracking down data about real buildings, a more realistic ratio appears to depend on a huge variety of variables, as well as the definition of the number of "lifetime" years. The ill-defined origins of the original ratio (1:5:200) describing these variables have made replication impossible. However, by using published sources of data, we have found that for three office buildings, a more realistic ratio is 1:0.4:12. As there is nothing in the public domain about what comprised the original research that gave rise to 1:5:200, it is not possible to make a true comparison between these new calculations and the originals. Clients and construction professionals stand to be misled because the popularity and widespread use of the wrong ratio appears to be mis-informing important investment and policy decisions.
Axcell, A, Procter, A and Fennell, B (2001) A national survey of total office costs. Real Estate Finance and Investment Paper 2001/01, City University Business School, London. Bamfield, B (2002) What does whole life cost mean to you? Whole Life Cost Forum - Main Contractors' section [www.wlcf.co.uk/MainContractors.htm] Accessed June 2004. Baum, Andrew (1994) Quality and property performance. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment. 12(1), 31-46. Brooks, A and Quirk, D (1999) Whole Life Cost Model. Building, Issue 2, 15 January. Hughes, Ancell, Hirst and Gruneberg 382 Building Cost Information Service (2003) Tender Price Service. [http://service.bcis.co.uk] Accessed May 2004. Building Design Partnership (2004) BDP Workplace. [http://www.bdp.co.uk/workplace/ratio.asp] Accessed June 2004. Building Maintenance Information (2003) BMI Special Report 321, April 2003, Review of Maintenance Costs. London: BMI. CABE (May 2002), Client Guide for Arts Capital Programme Projects, [www.cabe.org.uk/publications/] Department of Trade and Industry (2003) Construction Statistics Annual 2003. London: HMSO. Evans, R, Haryott, R, Haste, N and Jones, A (1998) The long term costs of owning and using buildings, London:Royal Academy of Engineering. Gershon, P (2002) OGC: Catalysing value for money in public procurement. Speech by Sir Peter Gershon, Chief Executive, Office of Government Commerce. Worldwide Hutcheson, J M (1994) The life cycle economics of buildings, Facilities, 12(5), 11-15. Jones Lang Lasalle (2002) Service Charge Analysis for Offices,[www.oscar.joneslanglasalle.co.uk] Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2004) Successful Delivery Toolkit, [http://www.ogc.gov.uk/sdtoolkit/delifecycle/index.html] Accessed May 2004.Office of National Statistics (1999) Labour Force Survey (Quarterly Supplement) No 5 May 1999 (Winter 1998/1999) London, ONS. Pearce, D (2003) The social and economic value of construction: the construction industry's guide to sustainable development 2003, The Construction Industry Research and Innovation Panel [www.crisp-uk.org.uk/reports/SocialandEconomicValue_FR03.pdf] accesed May 2004. Riley, M and Cotgrave, A (2004) Constructon Technology 2: Industrial and Commercial Building, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Sainsbury, D (2002) Lord Sainsbury's speech for CIBSE, 22 April 2002. [www.dti.gov.uk/ministers/archived/sainsbury220402.html] Accessed June 2004 Saxon, R C (2002) The industry 'formerly known as construction': an industry view of the Fairclough Review. Building Research and Information. 30(5), 334-337. Saxon, R C (2003) The industry formerly known as construction: implications for the Society of Construction Law. A talk to the Society of Construction Law, London, 3rd June. Seeley, I (1996) Building Economics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Skitmore, M and Marston, V (1999) The foundations of building economics, London: Spon. Stone, P A (1980) Building Design Evaluation Costs-in-Use, London: Spon. Wong, K C (2000) Valuing the Refurbishment Cycle. Property Management. 18(1), 16-24.
Centaur Editors: Update this record