Taking time to understand: articulating relationships between technologies and organizations
Whyte, J. (2010) Taking time to understand: articulating relationships between technologies and organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 29. pp. 217-236. ISSN 0733-558X
To link to this article DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000029016
Dynamic relationships between technologies and organizations are investigated through research on digital visualization technologies and their use in the construction sector. Theoretical work highlights mutual adaptation between technologies and organizations but does not explain instances of sustained, sudden, or increasing maladaptation. By focusing on the technological field, I draw attention to hierarchical structuring around inter-dependent levels of technology; technological priorities of diverse groups; power asymmetries and disjunctures between contexts of development and use. For complex technologies, such as digital technologies, I argue these field-level features explain why organizations peripheral to the field may experience difficulty using emerging technology.
Brown, J. & Cunningham, S. 2007. A history of ACM Siggraph. Communications of the ACM Archive, 50: 54-61. Christensen, C. M. 2000. The innovator's dilemma. New York: Harper Business. DTI. 2000. UK business potential for virtual reality, a market survey conducted by Cydata Limited on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962-1023. Friedman, A. L. 1994. The information technology field: Using fields and paradigms for analysing technological change. Human Relations, 47: 367-392. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of sun microsystems and java. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 196-214. Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32: 277-300. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. 2000. To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7: 329-348. Granqvist, N. 2007. Nanotechnology and nanolabeling : Essays on the emergence of new technological fields. HSI, Helsinki. Griffith, T. L. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24: 472-488. Howard, T. L. J., Hubbold, R. J., Murta, A. D., & West, A. J. 1995. 1995 survey of virtual reality activity in the uk: The Advanced Interfaces Group, SIMA Report. Hughes, T., P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press. Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17: 251-267. Munir, K. & Phillips, N. 2005. The birth of the kodak moment: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26: 1665-1687. Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3: 398-427. Orlikowski, W. J. & Barley, S. R. 2001. Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25: 145-165. Pettigrew, A. M. 1985. Contextualist research and the study of organizational change process. In E. Mumford & R. Hirschheim & G. Fitzgerald & A. T. Wood-Harper (Eds.), Research methods in information systems: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 colloquium: 53-78. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: New Holland. Scott, R. W. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Swann, G. M. P. & Watts, T. P. 2000. Visualisation needs vision: The pre-paradigmatic character of virtual reality. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? - technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. Watts, T., Swann, G. M. P., & Pandit, N. R. 1998. Virtual reality and innovation potential. Business Strategy Review, 9: 45-54. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage Publications. Whyte, J. K. 2002. Virtual reality and the built environment. Oxford: Architectural Press. Whyte, J. K. 2003. Innovation and users: Virtual reality in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics (CM&E), 21: 565 - 572. Woodward, J. 1980 . Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Centaur Editors: Update this record