Provider diversity in the English NHS: a study of recent developments in four local health economies
Allen , P., Turner, S. , Bartlett, W. , Perotin, V. , Matchaya, G. and Zamora, B. (2012) Provider diversity in the English NHS: a study of recent developments in four local health economies. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 17 (suppl 1). pp. 23-30. ISSN 1758-1060
To link to this article DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011015
Objectives: The overall objective of the research was to assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS. The aims were to map the extent of diverse provider activity, identify the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organisations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new private and TSOs. Methods: Case studies of four Local Health Economies (LHEs). Data included: semi-structured interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private and Third Sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November 2008 and November 2009. Results: Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners’ local strategies influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to the entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS Trusts to respond by making improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies. Conclusions: There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS, but care must be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.
1 Edwards N, Lewis R. Who owns and operates healthcare providers and does it matter? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2008;101:54–58 2 Department of Health. Health reform in England: update and next steps. London: Department of Health, 2005 3 Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS London: The Stationary Office, 2010 4 House of Commons Health Select Committee. Independent Sector Treatment Centres. Fourth Report of Session 2005–06. London: The Stationary Office, 2006 5 Pollock A, Godden S. Independent Sector Treatment Centres: evidence so far. British Medical Journal 2008;335: 421–424 6 Allen P. Restructuring the NHS again: supply side reform in recent English health care policy. Financial Accountability and Management 2009;25:343–389 7 Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985 8 Roberts J. Managing Markets. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1993;15:305–3 9 Ashton T. Contracting for health services in New Zealand: a transaction cost analysis. Social Science and Medicine 1997; 46;357–367 10 Croxson B. Organisational Costs in the New NHS: an introduction to the transaction costs and internal costs of delivering health care. London: Office of Health Economics, 1999 11 Allen P. A socio-legal analysis of contracting in the NHS internal market using a case study of contracting for district nursing. Social Sciences and Medicine 2002;54:255–66 12 Preker A, Harding A, Travis P. Make or buy decisions in the production of healthcare goods and services: new insights from institutional economics and organisational theory. Bulletin of the WHO 2000;78:779–790 13 Vincent-Jones P. The new public contracting: regulation, responsiveness, relationality.Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press, 2006 14 Anderson K. Independent Sector Treatment Centres. A report from Ken Anderson, Commercial Director, Department of Health, to the Secretary of State for Health. London: Department of Health,2006 15 Healthcare Commission and Audit Commission. Is the treatment working? Progress with NHS system reform programme. London: Healthcare Commission, 2008 16 Browne J, Jamieson L, Lewsey J, et al. Case-mix and patients reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Comparison with NHS providers. BMC Health Services Research 2008;78:1–7 17 Healthcare Commission. Independent Sector Treatment Centres. London: Healthcare Commission, 2007 18 Department of Health. Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. White Paper. Norwich: TSO, 2006 19 Allen P, Bartlett W, Perotin V, et al. New forms of provider in the English National Health Service. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 2011;82:177–95 20 Department of Health. Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. White Paper. Norwich: TSO, 2006 21 Tribal. Social Enterprises Pathfinder Evaluation Final Report. London: Department of Health, 2010 22 Vining AR,Globerman S. Contracting-out health care services: a conceptual framework. Health Policy 1999;46:77–96 23 Sloan F, Picone G, Taylor D, Chou S. Hospital ownership and cost and quality of care: Is there a dimes worth of difference? Journal of Health Economics 2001;20:1–21 24 Eggleston K, Shen Y, Lau J, et al. Hospital Ownership and Quality of Care: What Explains the Different Results in the Literature? Health Economics 2008;17:1345–62 25 George A, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2005 26 Miles M.Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance- the problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 1979;24:590–594 27 Maude F. Francis Maude launches pathfinder mutuals. Cabinet Office Press Release 12 August 2010. http:// www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/francis-maude-launchespathfinder- mutuals (last accessed 28 July 2010)
Repository Staff Only: item control page