Effective communication to improve udder health: can social science help?
Garforth, C. (2011) Effective communication to improve udder health: can social science help? In: Hogeveen, H. and Lam, T.J.G.M. (eds.) Udder Health and Communication. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 55-66. ISBN 9789086861859
To link to this item DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4
Improved udder health requires consistent application of appropriate management practices by those involved in managing dairy herds and the milking process. Designing effective communication requires that we understand why dairy herd managers behave in the way they do and also how the means of communication can be used both to inform and to influence. Social sciences- ranging from economics to anthropology - have been used to shed light on the behaviour of those who manage farm animals. Communication science tells us that influencing behaviour is not simply a question of „getting the message across‟ but of addressing the complex of factors that influence an individual‟s behavioural decisions. A review of recent studies in the animal health literature shows that different social science frameworks and methodologies offer complementary insights into livestock managers‟ behaviour but that the diversity of conceptual and methodological frameworks presents a challenge for animal health practitioners and policy makers who seek to make sense of the findings – and for researchers looking for helpful starting points. Data from a recent study in England illustrate the potential of „home-made‟ conceptual frameworks to help unravel the complexity of farmer behaviour. At the same time, though, the data indicate the difficulties facing those designing communication strategies in a context where farmers believe strongly that they are already doing all they can reasonably be expected to do to minimise animal health risks.
Benjamin, L. A., Fosgate, G. T., Ward, M. P., Roussel, A. J., Feagin, R. A., and Schwartz, A. L. (2010). Attitudes towards biosecurity practices relevant to Johne's disease control on beef cattle farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 94(3-4), 222-230. Boivin, X., Marcantognini, L., Boulesteix, P., Godet, J., Brule, A., and Veissier, I. (2007). Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Animal Welfare, 16(2), 147-151. Cattaneo, A. A., Wilson, R., Doohan, D., and LeJeune, J. T. (2009). Bovine veterinarians' knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding antibiotic resistance on Ohio dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(7), 3494-3502. Clausen, P. H., Bauer, B., Zessin, K. H., Diall, O., Bocoum, Z., Sidibe, I., et al. (2010). Preventing and Containing Trypanocide Resistance in the Cotton Zone of West Africa. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 57(1-2), 28-32. Cross, P., Williams, P., and Edwards-Jones, G. (2009). Differences in the perceptions of farmers and veterinary surgeons about the efficacy of mitigation strategies for controlling bluetongue. Veterinary Record, 165(14), 397-403. da Fonseca Delgado, F. E., Lima, W. d. S., da Cunha, A. P., Passos de Paiva Bello, A. C., Domingues, L. N., Bispos Wanderley, R. P., et al. (2009). Cattle helminthiasis: farmers perception in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 18, 29-33. Dossa, L. H., Wollny, C., and Gauly, M. (2007). Smallholders' perceptions of goat farming in southern Benin and opportunities for improvement. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 39(1), 49-57. Elbers, A. R. W., Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn, M. J., van der Velden, P. G., Loeffen, W. L. A., and Zarafshani, K. (2010). A socio-psychological investigation into limitations and incentives concerning reporting a clinically suspect situation aimed at improving early detection of classical swine fever outbreaks. Veterinary Microbiology, 142(1-2), 108-118. Ellis-Iversen, J., Cook, A., Watson, E., Nielen, M, Larkin, L., Wooldridge, M. and Hogeveen, H. (2010) Circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms Preventive Veterinary Medicine 93 (4): 276-285. Garforth, C., Bailey, A., Tranter, R., Aikman, P., Allison, K., Taylor, N., Wilsmore, T. (2011). Increasing the uptake of improved animal disease risk measures by animal keepers: attitudes, behaviours and practical lessons for responsibility and cost-sharing. Research report to Defra. Project FFG1013. University of Reading, 62pp. Garforth, C., Rehman, T., McKemey, K. and Rana, R. (2005) Livestock Farmers' Attitudes towards Consequential Loss Insurance Against Notifiable Diseases. Final report of a research study commissioned by the Livestock Strategy Division of the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, 83pp. Garforth, C., McKemey, K., Rehman, T., Tranter, R.B., Cooke, R., Park, J., Dorward, P. and Yates, C.M. (2006) Farmers' attitudes towards techniques for improving oestrus detection in dairy herds in South West England. Livestock Science 103(1-2):158-168. Green, A. L., Carpenter, L. R., Edmisson, D. E., Lane, C. D., Welborn, M. G., Hopkins, F. M., et al. (2010). Producer attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial use in beef cattle in Tennessee. Javma-Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 237(11), 1292-1298. Jansen, J., van Schaik, G., Renes, R. J., and Lam, T. (2010). The effect of a national mastitis control program on the attitudes, knowledge, and behavior of farmers in the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(12), 5737-5747. Jansen, J., Steuten, C., Renes, R., Aarts, N. and Lam, T. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: Effective communication on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 93 (3): 1296-1306. Jansen, J., van den Borne, B., Renes, R., van Schaik, G., Lam, T. and Leeuwis, C. (2009). Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: The influence of farmers' attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92 (3): 210-223. Leach, K. A., Whay, H. R., Maggs, C. M., Barker, Z. E., Paul, E. S., Bell, A. K., et al. (2010a). Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science, 89(2), 311-317. Leach, K. A., Whay, H. R., Maggs, C. M., Barker, Z. E., Paul, E. S., Bell, A. K., et al. (2010b). Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations. Research in Veterinary Science, 89(2), 318-323. Noremark, M., Lindberg, A., Vagsholm, I., and Lewerin, S. S. (2009). Disease awareness, information retrieval and change in biosecurity routines among pig farmers in association with the first PRRS outbreak in Sweden. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 90(1-2), 1-9. Rehman, T., McKemey, K., Yates, C. M., Cooke, R. J., Garforth, C. J., Tranter, R. B., and Rana, R. (2007). Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agricultural Systems, 94(2), 281-293. Vaarst, M., and Sorensen, J. T. (2009). Danish dairy farmers' perceptions and attitudes related to calf-management in situations of high versus no calf mortality. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 89(1-2), 128-133.