Transition of pupils from Key Stage 2 to 3 deemed gifted and talented in mathematics: an initial study
Harries, D. and Tennant, G. (2012) Transition of pupils from Key Stage 2 to 3 deemed gifted and talented in mathematics: an initial study. Mathematics Teaching, 226. pp. 9-12. ISSN 0025-5785
Official URL: http://www.atm.org.uk/journal/archive/mt226.html
In this article Geoff Tennant and Dave Harries report on the early stages of a research project looking to examine the transition from Key Stage (KS) 2 to 3 of children deemed Gifted and Talented (G&T) in mathematics. An examination of relevant literature points towards variation in definition of key terms and underlying rationale for activities. Preliminary fieldwork points towards a lack of meaningful communication between schools, with primary school teachers in particular left to themselves to decide how to work with children deemed G&T. Some pointers for action are given, along with ideas for future research and a request for colleagues interested in working with us to get in touch.
Blatchford, P., Hallam, S., Ireson, J., Kutnick, P., & Creech, A. (2008). Classes, groups and transitions structures for teaching and learning (Primary Review Research Survey 9/2). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education. Braund, M., & Hames, V. (2005). Improving progression and continuity from primary to secondary science: pupils’ reactions to bridging work. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), pp. 781-801. Brookes, J. (2004). Exploring the secondary transfer of gifted and talented pupils. Conference paper at Teaching and Learning Research Programme: Annual Conference Papers Cardiff. 22nd-24th November 2004. Brown, F., & Maytum, A. (2009). Easing transfer and transition in maths from KS2 to KS3. London: NCETM. Chedzoy, S. M., & Burden, R. L. (2005). Making the move: Assessing student attitudes to primary-secondary school transfer. Research in Education, 74(1), pp. 22-35. DCSF (2009a). National academy for gifted and talented youth: evaluation. London: HMSO. DCSF (2009b). Transfer of pupil data between schools: supporting documentation for common transfer file version 1.4. London: HMSO. Gardiner, A. (2000). Acceleration or enrichment: serving the needs of the top 10% in school mathematics. Birmingham: School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham. Hansard (2011). Education select committee proceedings: the impact of the EBac on progression and social mobility (web page) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmeduc/851/85106.htm (accessed 5th September 2011; updated 28th July 2011) IGGY (2011). International Gateway for Gifted Youth (web page) http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/iggy (accessed 5th September 2011; updated 29th July 2011) Kennard, R. (2001). Teaching mathematically able children. London: David Fulton Publishers. Koshy, V., & Murray, J., eds. (2002). Unlocking numeracy: a guide for primary schools. London: David Fulton Publishers. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. NAGTY (2006). NAGTY eligibility criteria (web page) http://ygt.dcsf.gov.uk/FileLinks/312_MainLink.pdf (accessed 6th August 2009; updated 29th September 2006) OFSTED (2002). Changing schools: evaluation of the effectiveness of transfer arrangements at age 11. London: HMSO. OFSTED (2003). Excellence in Cities and Education Action Zones: management and impact. London: HMSO. Stubbs, B. (2010). Student performance analysis (web page) http://www.bstubbs.co.uk/5a-c.htm (accessed 23rd December 2010; updated 22nd October 2010) Wilson, K., & Briggs, M. (2002). Able and gifted: judging by appearances? Mathematics Teaching(180), pp. 34-36.
Centaur Editors: Update this record