Accessibility navigation


The Bruton tenancy: a matter of relativity

Roberts, N. (2012) The Bruton tenancy: a matter of relativity. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 2012 (2). pp. 87-103. ISSN 0010-8200

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Argues that the controversial "Bruton tenancies" created by the House of Lords decision in Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust should be seen as a form of proprietary tenancy. Discusses the view that those without an estate in land are prevented by the nemo dat principle from granting a lease, the scope for tenancies derived from equitable interests, and the challenges to Bruton tenancies posed by the Court of Appeal ruling in Milmo v Carreras. Explains how Bruton tenancies create a circumscribed proprietary interest in land, best understood through the concept of relativity of title.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:28075
Publisher:Sweet and Maxwell

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation