Accessibility navigation


Reasons, impossibility and efficient steps: reply to Heuer

Streumer, B. (2010) Reasons, impossibility and efficient steps: reply to Heuer. Philosophical Studies, 151 (1). pp. 79-86. ISSN 1573-0883

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1007/s11098-009-9422-6

Abstract/Summary

Ulrike Heuer argues that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action that this person cannot perform, as long as this person can take efficient steps towards performing this action. In this reply, I first argue that Heuer’s examples fail to undermine my claim that there cannot be a reason for a person to perform an action if it is impossible that this person will perform this action. I then argue that, on a plausible interpretation of what ‘efficient steps’ are, Heuer’s claim is consistent with my claim. I end by showing that Heuer fails to undermine the arguments I gave for my claim.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
ID Code:28724
Uncontrolled Keywords:Reasons for action - Impossibility
Publisher:Springer

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation