What people study when they study Twitter: classifying Twitter related academic papers
Williams, S., Terras, M. M. and Warwick, C. (2013) What people study when they study Twitter: classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, 69 (3). pp. 384-410. ISSN 0022-0418
To link to this article DOI: 10.1108/JD-03-2012-0027
PURPOSE: Since its introduction in 2006, messages posted to the microblogging system Twitter have provided a rich dataset for researchers, leading to the publication of over a thousand academic papers. This paper aims to identify this published work and to classify it in order to understand Twitter based research. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Firstly the papers on Twitter were identified. Secondly, following a review of the literature, a classification of the dimensions of microblogging research was established. Thirdly, papers were qualitatively classified using open coded content analysis, based on the paper’s title and abstract, in order to analyze method, subject, and approach. FINDINGS: The majority of published work relating to Twitter concentrates on aspects of the messages sent and details of the users. A variety of methodological approaches are used across a range of identified domains. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This work reviewed the abstracts of all papers available via database search on the term “Twitter” and this has two major implications: 1) the full papers are not considered and so works may be misclassified if their abstract is not clear, 2) publications not indexed by the databases, such as book chapters, are not included. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To date there has not been an overarching study to look at the methods and purpose of those using Twitter as a research subject. Our major contribution is to scope out papers published on Twitter until the close of 2011. The classification derived here will provide a framework within which researchers studying Twitter related topics will be able to position and ground their work
Achrekar, H., Gandhe, A., Lazarus, R., Ssu-Hsin, Y. & Benyuan, L. Predicting Flu Trends using Twitter data. Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2011 IEEE Conference on, 10-15 April 2011 2011. 702-707. Arakawa, Y., Tagashira, S. & Fukuda, A. 2010. Relationship Analysis between User's Contexts and Real Input Words through Twitter. 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops. Assogba, Y. & Donath, J. Mycrocosm: Visual Microblogging. System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, 5-8 Jan. 2009 2009. 1-10. Atencio, C. A., Blake, D. T., Strata, F., Cheung, S. W., Merzenich, M. M. & Schreiner, C. E. 2007. Frequency-modulation encoding in the primary auditory cortex of the awake owl monkey. J Neurophysiol, 98, 2182-95. Avello, D. G. 2011. All liaisons are dangerous when all your friends are known to us. HT '11: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. ACM. Barnes, S. J. & Bohringer, M. 2011. Modeling use Continuance Behavior in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51, 1-10. Barnes, S. J., Böhringer, M., Kurze, C. & Stietzel, J. 2010. Towards an understanding of social software: the case of Arinia. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2010. Hawaii. Bernstein, M. S., Suh, B., Hong, L., Chen, J., Kairam, S. & Chi, E. H. 2010. Eddi: Interactive topic-based browsing of social status streams. UIST 2010 - 23rd ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Bollen, J., Mao, H. & Zeng, X. 2011. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2, 1-8. Journal of Documentation Page 24 of 28 Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. B. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. Boyd, D., Golder, S. & Lotan, G. Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. 2010. 1-10. Buzzi, M. C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B. & Akhter, F. Is Facebook really "open" to all? Technology and Society (ISTAS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on, 7-9 June 2010 2010. 327-336. Chen, C., Li, F., Ooi, B. C. & Wu, S. 2011. TI: An efficient indexing mechanism for real-time search on tweets. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Athens. Cheong, M. & Lee, V. 2010. Dissecting Twitter: A Review on Current Microblogging Research and Lessons from Related Fields. From Sociology to Computing in Social Networks: Theory, Foundations and Applications. Springer-Verlag. Cheong, M. & Ray, S. 2011. A Literature Review of Recent Microblogging Developments. Victoria, Australia: Clayton School of Information Technology, Monash University. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage Publications, . Cormod, G., Krishnamurthy, B. & Willinger, W. 2010. A manifesto for modeling and measurement in social media. First Monday [Online], 15. Available: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/vie wArticle/3072/2601. Dann, S. 2010. Twitter content classification. First Monday [Online], 15. Available: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/vie wArticle/2745/2681. Devoe, K. M. 2009. Bursts of Information: Microblogging. The Reference Librarian, 50, 212-214. Dodds, P. S., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bliss, C. A. & Danforth, C. M. 2011. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: hedonometrics and twitter. PLoS One, 6, e26752. Dork, M., Gruen, D., Williamson, C. & Carpendale, S. 2010. A Visual Backchannel for Large-Scale Events. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16, 1129-1138. Dörk, M., Gruen, D., Williamson, C. & Carpendale, S. 2010. A Visual backchannel for large-scale events. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16, 1129-1138. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M. & Meyer, I. 2010. Microblogs in Higher Education – A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 92-100. Ellis, D. 1989. A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design. Journal of Documentation, 45, 171-212. Ellis, D. & Haugan, M. 1997. Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53, 384-403. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. Erickson, I. Understanding socio-locative practices. 2007 Sanibel Island, FL. Erickson, I. 2008. The translucence of Twitter. Proceedings of the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark. Ferguson, D. A. & Greer, C. F. 2011. Local Radio and Microblogging: How Radio Stations in the U.S. are Using Twitter. Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 18, 33-46. Gelernter, J. & Mushegian, N. 2011. Geo-parsing messages from microtext. Transactions in GIS, 15, 753-773. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL., Aldine Publishing. Goldstein, H. & Romero, J. J. 2009. IEEE Spectrum online: Content is liberated! Spectrum, IEEE, 46, 10-10. Gonçalves, B., Perra, N. & Vespignani, A. 2011. Modeling Users’ Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar’s Number. PLoS ONE, 6. Green, R. 2000. Locating Sources in Humanities Scholarship: The Efficacy of following Bibliographic References. The Library Quarterly, 70, 201-229. Guy, C., Paterson, A., Currie, H., Lee, A. J. & Cumming, G. P. 2010. Twittering on about social networking and babyfeeding matters. British Journal of Midwifery, 18, 620-627. Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S. C. 2009. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M. & Lee, A. 2011. A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior. Jacso, P. 2005. As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89, 1537-1547. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. & Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis - WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07. Karger, D. R. & Quan, D. 2005. What would it mean to blog on the semantic web? Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 3, 147-157. Khrabrov, A. & Cybenko, G. Discovering influence in communication networks using dynamic graph analysis. 2010. 288-294. Kierkegaard, S. 2010. Twitter thou doeth? Computer Law & Security Review, 26, 577-594. Kousha, K. & Thelwall, M. 2009. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1537-1549. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P. & Arlitt, M. 2008. A few chirps about Twitter. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Online Social Networks: WOSN’08. Seattle, Washington, USA.: ACM. Levine-Clark, M. & Gil, E. 2009. A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools. Online Information Review, 33, 986-996. Li, G., Cao, J., Jiang, J., Li, Q. & Yao, L. 2011. Brand tweets: How to popularize the enterprise Micro-blogs. Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC). Chongqing: IEEE. Lindgren, S. & Lundstrom, R. 2011. Pirate culture and hacktivist mobilization: The cultural and social protocols of #WikiLeaks on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13, 999-1018. Mandavilli, A. 2011. Trial by Twitter. Nature, 469, 286-287. Marshall, C. C. & Shipman, F. 2011. Attitudes about Institutional Archiving of Social Media. Archiving 2011: Preservation Strategies and Imaging Technologies for Cultural Heritage Institutions and Memory Organizations. Marwick, A. E. & Boyd, D. 2010. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114-133. Mcfedries, P. 2007. All A Twitter. IEEE Spectrum, 84. Merchant, G. 2011. Unravelling the social network: theory and research. Learning, Media and Technology, 1-16. Muralidharan, S., Rasmussen, L., Patterson, D. & Shin, J.-H. 2011. Hope for Haiti: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Review, 37, 175-177. Naaman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.-H. & Acm 2010. Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J. & Alhadi, A. C. 2011. Bad News Travel Fast: A Content-based Analysis of Interestingness on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM WebSci’11. Koblenz, Germany. Passant, A., Hastrup, T. & Boj, U. 2008. Microblogging : A Semantic and Distributed Approach. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web. Petrovi, S., Osborne, M. & Lavrenko, V. 2010. The Edinburgh Twitter corpus. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Linguistics in a World of Social Media. Los Angeles, California: Association for Computational Linguistics. Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C. & Welsh, A. 2011. Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of Documentation, 67, 214-237. Russell, M. A. 2011a. 21 recipes for mining Twitter. Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly Media. Russell, M. A. 2011b. Mining the social web, Sebastopol, Calif., O'Reilly. Sadikov, E., Medina, M., Leskovec, J. & Garcia-Molina, H. 2011. Correcting for missing data in information cascades. Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM Sakak, T., Okazaki, M. & Matsuo, Y. 2010. Earthquake shakes twitter users: realtime event detection by social sensors,. 9th international conference on World wide web. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Stemler, S. 2001. An Overview of Content Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation [Online], 7(17). Available: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17. Page 27 of 28 Journal of Documentation Talja, S. & Maula, H. 2003. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 59, 673-691. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Spencer, J. & Wu, L. 2009. Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? Library & Information Science Research, 31, 139-148. Waters, R. D. & Jamal, J. Y. 2011. Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37, 321-324. Weinberger, S. 2011. Spies to use Twitter as crystal ball. Nature, 478, 301. Weller, M. 2011. The Digital Scholar, London, Bloomsburt Academic. Wenger, E., White, N. & Smith, J. D. 2009. Digital Habitats, Portland, CPsquare. Whitelaw, C., Agrawal, M., Rao, H. R. & Onook, O. Using social media to study social pheonomena: An example using Twitter data. Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), 2011, 13-15 April 2011 2011. 1- 3. Wigand, F. D. L. 2010. Twitter takes wing in government: diffusion, roles, and management. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities. Puebla, Mexico: Digital Government Society of North America. Wigley, S. & Lewis, B. K. 2011. Rules of engagement: Practice what you tweet. Public Relations Review. Yamasaki, S. A trust rating method for information providers over the social web service: A pragmatic protocol for trust among information explorers and information providers. Proceedings - 11th IEEE/IPSJ International Symposium on Applications and the Internet, SAINT 2011. 578-582. Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J. & Wu, Y. 2010. A Case Study of Micro-blogging in the Enterprise: Use, Value, and Related Issues. CHI 2010: Organizations and Communities Atlanta, GA, USA. Zhao, D. & Rosson, M. B. 2009. How and why people Twitter: the role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work - GROUP '09. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
Centaur Editors: Update this record