Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests
Full text not archived in this repository.
To link to this item DOI: 10.1007/s11023-013-9301-y
A series of imitation games involving 3-participant (simultaneous comparison of two hidden entities) and 2-participant (direct interrogation of a hidden entity) were conducted at Bletchley Park on the 100th anniversary of Alan Turing’s birth: 23 June 2012. From the ongoing analysis of over 150 games involving (expert and non-expert, males and females, adults and child) judges, machines and hidden humans (foils for the machines), we present six particular conversations that took place between human judges and a hidden entity that produced unexpected results. From this sample we focus on features of Turing’s machine intelligence test that the mathematician/code breaker did not consider in his examination for machine thinking: the subjective nature of attributing intelligence to another mind.
Block, N. (1981). Psychologism and behaviorism. In S. Shieber (Ed.), The Turing test: Verbal behavior as the hallmark of intelligence (pp. 229–266). UK: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. (2008). Turing on the imitation game. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts, & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing test: Philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer (pp. 103–106). USA: Springer. Copeland, B. J. (2004). The essential Turing—The ideas that gave birth to the computer age. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Demchenko, E., & Veselov, V. (2008). Who fools whom? The great mystification, or methodological issues on making fools of human beings. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts, & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing test: Philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer. Berlin: Springer. Epstein, R. (2008). The quest for the thinking computer. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts, & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing test: Philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer (pp. 3–12). Berlin: Springer. Floridi, L., Taddeo, M., & Turilli, M. (2009). Turing’s imitation game: Still an impossible challenge for all machines and some judges. Minds and Machines, 19(1), 145–150. Fowler, H., & Fowler, F. (Eds.). (1995). The concise oxford dictionary of current English (9th ed., p. 486). Oxford: Clarendon Press. French, R. M. (2000). The Turing test: The first 50 years. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), 115–122. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Harnad, S. (1992). The Turing test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 3(4), 9–10. Hayes, P., & Ford, K. (1995). Turing test considered harmful. In Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 972–977), Montreal. Hodges, A. (1992). Alan Turing: The enigma. New York: Vintage Press. Levesque, H. J. (2009). Is it enough to get the behavior right? In Proceedings of the twenty-first international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1439–1444), Pasadena, USA, July 11–17. Moor, J. H. (1976). An analysis of the Turing test. Philosophical Studies, 30(4), 249–257. Moor, J. H. (2003). The status and future of the Turing test. In J. H. Moor (Ed.), The Turing test–The elusive standard of artificial intelligence (pp. 197–214). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Preston, J., & Bishop, J. M. (Eds.). (2002). Views into the Chinese room. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Purtill, R. L. (1971). Beating the imitation game. Mind, 80(318), 290–294. Searle, J. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. New York: New York Review of Books. Shah, H. (2011). Turing’s misunderstood imitation game and IBM Watson’s success. In Proceedings of the 2nd towards a comprehensive intelligence test (TCIT)—Reconsidering the Turing test for the 21st century, symposium in AISB 2011 convention (pp. 1–5), York University, UK. Available here: http://www.academia.edu/474617/Turings_misunderstood_imitation_game_and_IBMs_Watson_ success. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010a). From the buzzing in Turing’s head to machine intelligence contests. In Proceedings of symposium for 1st towards a comprehensive intelligence test. AISB Convention, De Montfort, UK, 29 March–1 April. Available here: http://www.academia.edu/226311/From_the_ Buzzing_in_Turings_Head_to_Machine_Intelligence_Contests. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010b). Testing Turing’s five minutes, parallel-paired imitation game. Kybernetes, 39(3), 449–465. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010c). Hidden interlocutor misidentification in practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines, 20, 441–454. Warwick, K. (2011). Artificial intelligence: The basics. London: Routledge. Wheeler, M. (2010). Plastic machines: Behavioural diversity and the Turing test. Kybernetes, 39(3), 466–480. Whitby, B. (1996). The Turing test: AI’s biggest blind alley? In P. J. R. Millican & A. Clark (Eds.), Machine and thought: The legacy of Alan Turing (Vol. 1, pp. 53–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.