Accessibility navigation


Experimental economics and the artificiality of alteration

Bardsley, N. (2005) Experimental economics and the artificiality of alteration. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12 (2). pp. 239-251. ISSN 1469-942

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/13501780500086115

Abstract/Summary

A neglected critique of social science laboratories alleges that they implement phenomena different to those supposedly under investigation. The critique purports to be conceptual and so invulnerable to a technical solution. I argue that it undermines some economics designs seeking to implement features of real societies, and counsels more modesty in experimental write‐ups. It also constitutes a plausible argument that laboratory economics experiments are necessarily less demonstrative than natural scientific ones. More radical sceptical conclusions are unwarranted.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Faculty of Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Economic and Social Sciences Division > Food Economics and Marketing (FEM)
ID Code:33359
Publisher:Taylor & Francis

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation