Accessibility navigation


Spatial analysis of the error in a model of soil nitrogen

Pringle, M. J., Baxter, S. J., Marchant, B. P. and Lark, R. M. (2008) Spatial analysis of the error in a model of soil nitrogen. Ecological Modelling, 211 (3-4). pp. 453-467. ISSN 0304-3800

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.09.021

Abstract/Summary

Models of the dynamics of nitrogen in soil (soil-N) can be used to aid the fertilizer management of a crop. The predictions of soil-N models can be validated by comparison with observed data. Validation generally involves calculating non-spatial statistics of the observations and predictions, such as their means, their mean squared-difference, and their correlation. However, when the model predictions are spatially distributed across a landscape the model requires validation with spatial statistics. There are three reasons for this: (i) the model may be more or less successful at reproducing the variance of the observations at different spatial scales; (ii) the correlation of the predictions with the observations may be different at different spatial scales; (iii) the spatial pattern of model error may be informative. In this study we used a model, parameterized with spatially variable input information about the soil, to predict the mineral-N content of soil in an arable field, and compared the results with observed data. We validated the performance of the N model spatially with a linear mixed model of the observations and model predictions, estimated by residual maximum likelihood. This novel approach allowed us to describe the joint variation of the observations and predictions as: (i) independent random variation that occurred at a fine spatial scale; (ii) correlated random variation that occurred at a coarse spatial scale; (iii) systematic variation associated with a spatial trend. The linear mixed model revealed that, in general, the performance of the N model changed depending on the spatial scale of interest. At the scales associated with random variation, the N model underestimated the variance of the observations, and the predictions were correlated poorly with the observations. At the scale of the trend, the predictions and observations shared a common surface. The spatial pattern of the error of the N model suggested that the observations were affected by the local soil condition, but this was not accounted for by the N model. In summary, the N model would be well-suited to field-scale management of soil nitrogen, but suited poorly to management at finer spatial scales. This information was not apparent with a non-spatial validation. (c),2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science
Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Soil Research Centre
ID Code:4030
Uncontrolled Keywords:soil nitrogen spatially distributed model model validation linear model of coregionalization residual maximum likelihood GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS DEPENDENT VARIABILITY COMPUTER-SIMULATION MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD WAVELET ANALYSIS LANDSCAPE-SCALE CROP NITROGEN WINTER-WHEAT PREDICTION FIELD
Additional Information:

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation