Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances
Williams, N. M., Crone, E. E., Roulston, T.'a. H., Minckley, R. L., Packer, L. and Potts, S. G. (2010) Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biological Conservation, 143 (10). pp. 2280-2291. ISSN 0006-3207
Full text not archived in this repository.
To link to this article DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024
The ability to predict the responses of ecological communities and individual species to human-induced environmental change remains a key issue for ecologists and conservation managers alike. Responses are often variable among species within groups making general predictions difficult. One option is to include ecological trait information that might help to disentangle patterns of response and also provide greater understanding of how particular traits link whole clades to their environment. Although this ‘‘trait-guild” approach has been used for single disturbances, the importance of particular traits on general responses to multiple disturbances has not been explored. We used a mixed model analysis of 19 data sets from throughout the world to test the effect of ecological and life-history traits on the responses of bee species to different types of anthropogenic environmental change. These changes included habitat loss, fragmentation, agricultural intensification, pesticides and fire. Individual traits significantly affected bee species responses to different disturbances and several traits were broadly predictive among multiple disturbances. The location of nests – above vs. below ground – significantly affected response to habitat loss, agricultural intensification, tillage regime (within agriculture) and fire. Species that nested above ground were on average more negatively affected by isolation from natural habitat and intensive agricultural land use than were species nesting below ground. In contrast below-ground-nesting species were more negatively affected by tilling than were above-ground nesters. The response of different nesting guilds to fire depended on the time since the burn. Social bee species were more strongly affected by isolation from natural habitat and pesticides than were solitary bee species. Surprisingly, body size did not consistently affect species responses, despite its importance in determining many aspects of individuals’ interaction with their environment. Although synergistic interactions among traits remain to be explored, individual traits can be useful in predicting and understanding responses of related species to global change.
● Cane, J.H., Sipes, S., 2006. Floral specialization by bees: analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. In: Waser, N.M., Ollerton, J. (Eds.), Plant-Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 99–122. ● Cane, J.H., Minckley, R.L., Kervin, L.J., Roulston, T.H., Williams, N.M., 2006. Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecological Applications 16, 632–644. ● Davidson, D.W., Inouye, R.S., Brown, J.H., 1984. Granivory in a desert ecosystem: experimental evidence for indirect facilitation of ants by rodents. Ecology 65, 17801786. ● Davies, K.F., Margules, C.R., Lawrence, J.F., 2000. Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81, 1450–1461. ● Davies, K.F., Margules, C.R., Lawrence, J.F., 2004. A synergistic effect puts rare, specialized species at greater risk of extinction. Ecology 85, 265–271. ● Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Jiguet, F., 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117, 507–514. ● Fagan, W.F., Meir, E., Moore, J.L., 1999. Variation thresholds for extinction and their implications for conservation strategies. American Naturalist 154, 510–520. ● Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16, 265–280. ● Gallai, N., Salles, J.M., Setelle, J., Vaissiere, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted to pollinator decline. Ecological Economics 68, 810–821. ● Gathmann, A., Tscharntke, T., 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 757–764. ● Gels, J.A., Held, D.W., Potter, D.A., 2002. Hazards of insecticides to the bumble bees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) foraging on flowering white clover in turf. Ecotoxicology 95, 722–728. ● Gemmill-Herren, B., Ochieng, A.O., 2008. Role of native bees and natural habitats in eggplant (Solanum melongena) pollination in Kenya. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 127, 31–36. ● Goulson, D., Hanley, M.E., Darvill, B., Ellis, J.S., Knight, M.E., 2005. Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biological Conservation 122, 1–8. ● Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Balmford, A., 2005. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307, 550–555. ● Greenleaf, S.S., Williams, N.M., Winfree, R., Kremen, C., 2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596. ● Henle, K., Davies, K.F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C.R., Settele, J., 2004. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 207– 251. ● Jauker, F., Deikötter, T., Schwarzbach, F., Wolters, V., 2009. Pollinator dispersal in an agricultural matrix: opposing responses of wild bees and hoverflies to landscape structure and distance from main habitat. Landscape Ecology 24, 547–555. ● Kim, J., Williams, N.M., Kremen, C., 2006. Effects of cultivation and proximity to natural habitat on ground-nesting native bees in California sunflower fields. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 79:309–320. ● Kleijn, D., Kohler, F., Báldi, A., Batáry, P., Concepción, E.D., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., Gabriel, D., Holzschuh, A., Knop, E., Kovács, A.A., Marshall, E.J.P., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J.J., 2009. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and landuse intensity in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276, 903–909. ● Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Buchori, D., Tscharntke, T., 2002. Effects of landuse intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trapnesting bees and wasps. Conservation Biology 16, 1003–1014. ● Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., 2003a. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with diversity of pollinating bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270, 955–961. ● Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., 2003b. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 837–845. ● Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Tscharntke, T., 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274, 303–313. ● Klein, A.-M., Cunningham, S.A., Bos, M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., 2008. Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89, 935–943. ● Kolb, A., Diekmann, M., 2005. Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology 19, 929–938. ● Kremen, C., Williams, N.M., Thorp, R.W., 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 16812–16816. Kremen, C., Williams, N.M., Aizen, M.A., Gemmill-Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R.L., Packer, L., Potts, S.G., Roulston, T.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Vazquez, D.P., Winfree, R., Adams, L.D., Crone, E.E., Greenleaf, S.S., Keitt, T.H., Klein, A.-M., Regetz, J., Ricketts, T.H., 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10, 299–314. ● Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., Burks, B.D., 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Larsen, T.H., Williams, N.M., Kremen, C., 2005. Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 8, 538–547. ● Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16, 545–556. ● MacKenzie, K., Eickwort, G.C., 1996. Diversity and abundance of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) foraging on highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L) in central New York. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 69, 185–194. ● Mason, N.W.H., Lanoiselee, C., Mouillot, D., Irz, P., Argillier, C., 2007. Functional characters combined with null models reveal inconsistency in mechanisms of species turnover in lacustrine fish communities. Oecologia 153, 441–452. ● Mathewson, J.A., 1968. Nest construction and life history of the Eastern cucurbit bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 41, 255–261. ● McKinney, M.L., 1997. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 495–516. ● Michener, C.D., 2000. Bees of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA. Moretti, M., de Bello, F., Roberts, S.P.M., Potts, S.G., 2009. Taxonomical vs. functional responses of bee communities to fire in two contrasting climatic regions. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 98–108. ● NRC-USA, 2007. Status of Pollinators in North America. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. Oostermeijer, J.G.B., 2000. Population viability analysis of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe: importance of genetics, demography, and reproductive biology. In: Young, A.G., Clarke, G.M. (Eds.), Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 313–334. ● Osborne, J.L., Martin, A.P., Shortall, C.R., Todd, A.D., Goulson, D., Knight, M.E., Hale, R.J., Sanderson, R.A., 2008. Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 784–792. ● Petchey, O.L., Gaston, K.J., 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters 9, 741–758. ● Pimm, S.L., Diamond, J., Reed, T.M., Russell, G.J., Verner, J., 1993. Times to extinction for small populations of large birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90, 10871–10875. ● Poschlod, P., Kiefer, S., Tränkle, U., Fischer, S., Bonn, S., 1998. Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time. Applied Vegetation Science 1, 75–90. ● Potts, S.G., Willmer, P.G., 1997. Abiotic and biotic factors influencing nest-site selection by Halictus rubicundus, a ground nesting halictine bee. Ecological Entomology 22, 319–328. ● Potts, S.G., Willmer, P.G., 1998. Compact housing in built-up areas: spatial positioning of nests in aggregations of a ground-nesting bee. Ecological Entomology 23, 427–432. ● Potts, S.G., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G., 2001. Pollination of a core flowering shrub species in Mediterranean phrygana: variation in pollinator diversity, abundance and effectiveness in response to fire. Oikos 92, 71–80. ● Potts, S.G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G., O’Toole, C., Roberts, S., Willmer, P., 2003a. Response of plant-pollinator communities to fire: changes in diversity, abundance and floral reward structure. Oikos 101, 103–112. ● Potts, S.G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G., O’Toole, C., Roberts, S., Willmer, P., 2003b. Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84, 2628–2642. ● Potts, S.G., Vulliamy, B., Roberts, S., O’Toole, C., Dafni, A., Ne’Eman, G., Willmer, P., 2005. Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Entomology 30, 78–85. ● Potts, S.G., Petanidou, T., Roberts, S., O’Toole, C., Hulbert, A., Willmer, P., 2006. Plantpollinator biodiversity and pollination services in a complex Mediterranean landscape. Biological Conservation 129, 519–529. ● R Development Core Team, 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Ricketts, T.H., 2004. Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conservation Biology 18, 1262–1271. ● Ricketts, T.H., Regetz, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Bogdanski, A., Gemmill-Herren, B., Greenleaf, S.S., Klein, A.-M., Mayfield, M.M., Morandin, L.A., Ochieng, A., Viana, B.F., 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecology Letters 11, 499–515. ● Roemer, G.W., 2002. Golden eagles, feral pigs, and insular carnivores: How exotic species turn native predators into prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 791–796. ● Rundlöf, M., Nilsson, H., Smith, H.G., 2008. Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees. Biological Conservation 141, 417–426. ● Rust, R.W., Vaissiere, B.E., Westrich, P., 2003. Pollinator biodiversity and floral resource use in Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae) a Mediterranean endemic. Apidologie 34, 29–34. ● Sepp, K., Mikk, M., Mand, M., Truu, J., 2004. Bumblebee communities as an indicator for landscape monitoring in the agri-environmental programme. Landscape and Urban Planning 67, 173–183. ● Settele, J., Poethke, H.J., 1996. Towards demographic vulnerability categories of butterflies. In: Setelle, J., Margules, C.R., Poshchlod, P., Henle, K. (Eds.), Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 282–289. ● Shuler, R., Roulston, T.H., Farris, G., 2005. Farming practices influence wild pollinator populations on squash and pumpkin. Journal of Economic Entomology 98, 790–795. ● Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121, 432–440. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Munzenberg, U., Burger, C., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T., 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83, 1421–1432. ● Stockhammer, K.A., 1966. Nesting habits and life cycle of a sweat bee, Augochlora pura. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 39, 157–192. ● Stoks, R., McPeek, M.A., 2003. Predators and life histories shape Lestes damselfly assemblages along a freshwater habitat gradient. Ecology, 84:1576–1587. ● Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.-M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8, 857–874. ● Vazquez, D.P., Simberloff, D., 2002. Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: Conjectures and refutations. American Naturalist 159, 606–623. ● Vazquez, D.P., Simberloff, D., 2003. Changes in interaction biodiversity induced by an introduced ungulate. Ecology Letters 6, 1077–1083. ● Westphal, C., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., 2003. Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters 6, 961–965. ● Winfree, R., Griswold, T., Kremen, C., 2007. Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conservation Biology 21, 213–223. ● Winfree, R., Aguilar, R., Vazquez, D.P., LeBuhn, G., Aizen, M.A., 2009. A meta-analysis of bees’ response to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90, 2068–2076. ● Zanette, L.R.S., Martins, R.P., Riberio, S.P., 2005. Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landscape and Urban Planning 71, 105–121. ● Zayed, A., Roubik, D.W., Packer, L., 2004. Use of diploid male frequency data as an indicator of pollinator decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271, S9–S12.