Accessibility navigation


Transboundary ‘hydro-hegemony’: 10 years later

Warner, J., Mirumachi, N., Farnum, R. L., Grandi, M., Menga, F. and Zeitoun, M. (2017) Transboundary ‘hydro-hegemony’: 10 years later. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4 (6). e1242. ISSN 2049-1948

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

418kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1242

Abstract/Summary

This article places the theorization and analysis of hydro-hegemony in the context of the scholarship on transboundary water conflict and cooperation. We discuss critiques, developments, and debates in this domain over the past 10 years, focusing particularly on the contributions of the London Water Research Group, showing how thinking on the theorization and analysis of hydro-hegemony—and hydropolitics—has moved beyond the state-centricity, the tendency to see hegemony as solely negative, and the conceptually hegemonic potential of hydro-hegemony itself. Various strands of international relations theory (realism, neo-institutionalism, critical theory) have left their mark on the London School. Intense interaction between analysts and pragmatic practitioners is found to invite (or incite) eclecticism as well as promote vibrancy.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
ID Code:72424
Publisher:Wiley

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation