Revisiting youden’s index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies
Böhning, D., Böhning, W. and Holling, H. (2008) Revisiting youden’s index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17 (6). pp. 543-554. ISSN 1477-0334
Full text not archived in this repository.
To link to this article DOI: 10.1177/0962280207081867
The paper considers meta-analysis of diagnostic studies that use a continuous score for classification of study participants into healthy or diseased groups. Classification is often done on the basis of a threshold or cut-off value, which might vary between studies. Consequently, conventional meta-analysis methodology focusing solely on separate analysis of sensitivity and specificity might be confounded by a potentially unknown variation of the cut-off value. To cope with this phenomena it is suggested to use, instead, an overall estimate of the misclassification error previously suggested and used as Youden’s index and; furthermore, it is argued that this index is less prone to between-study variation of cut-off values. A simple Mantel–Haenszel estimator as a summary measure of the overall misclassification error is suggested, which adjusts for a potential study effect. The measure of the misclassification error based on Youden’s index is advantageous in that it easily allows an extension to a likelihood approach, which is then able to cope with unobserved heterogeneity via a nonparametric mixture model. All methods are illustrated at hand of an example on a diagnostic meta-analysis on duplex doppler ultrasound, with angiography as the standard for stroke prevention.
Centaur Editors: Update this record