Accessibility navigation


Parfit's final arguments in normative ethics

Hooker, B. (2020) Parfit's final arguments in normative ethics. In: McMahan, J., Campbell, T., Goodrich, J. and Ramakrishnan, K. (eds.) Essays in Honour of Derek Parfit: Normative Ethics and Personal Identity. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

291kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

This paper starts by juxtaposing the normative ethics in the final part of Parfit's final book, On What Matters, vol. 3 (2017), with the normative ethics in his earlier books, Reasons and Persons (1984) and On What Matters, vol. 1 (2011). The paper then addresses three questions. The first is, where does the reflective-equilibrium methodology that Parfit endorsed in the first volume of On What Matters lead? The second is, is the Act-involving Act Consequentialism that Parfit considers in the final volume of On What Matters as plausible as Rossian deontology? The third is, how is the new argument that Parfit puts forward for Rule Consequentialism supposed to work?

Item Type:Book or Report Section
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
ID Code:89642
Publisher:Oxford University Press

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation