Accessibility navigation

Phenomenalism, or neutral monism, in Mach’s analysis of sensations?

Preston, J. (2020) Phenomenalism, or neutral monism, in Mach’s analysis of sensations? In: Preston, J. (ed.) Interpreting Ernst Mach: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


I set out the factors which tempt people into reading Ernst Mach's book The Analysis of Sensations as putting forward either a version of phenomenalism or a version of neutral monism, and then assess the strengths and weaknesses of these two readings. I present an ‘internal’ view of that text, showing that it by no means mandates the phenomenalist reading, and that a case for something more like the neutral monist reading can be made from within that book, indeed largely from within its famous first chapter.

Item Type:Book or Report Section
Divisions:Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
ID Code:90946
Publisher:Cambridge University Press

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation