Accessibility navigation

Causation, remoteness and the concept of the “overwhelming supervening act”: R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243

Lists
Tools

Krebs, B. (2022) Causation, remoteness and the concept of the “overwhelming supervening act”: R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243. Journal of Criminal Law, 86 (1). pp. 42-45. ISSN 1740-5580

[img]
Preview
 Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
422kB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
135kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/00220183221077261

Abstract/Summary

This is a case commentary on R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243. It considers the concept of ‘overwhelming supervening act’ (OSA) and its relationship to the concepts of causation, remoteness and the so-called ‘fundamental difference rule’ (FDR).

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:102408
Publisher:SAGE
Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric
Deposit Details

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation

See also