Accessibility navigation

The (cross-cultural) problem of categories: who is ‘child’, what is ‘family’

Ribbens McCarthy, J., Evans, R. ORCID:, Yu, G. and Kébé, F. (2020) The (cross-cultural) problem of categories: who is ‘child’, what is ‘family’. In: Frankel, S. (ed.) Bringing Children Back into the Family. Relationality and Connectedness: interpreting child-adult/ adult-child positioning within the home. Sociological Studies of Childhood and Youth, 27. Emerald Publishing, Collection 1.

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


The category of ‘child’ is often presumed to be underpinned by ‘natural’ biological differences from the category of ‘adult’, and the category of ‘family’ is open to similar ‘naturalising’ and universalizing tendencies. Challenging this view has been a central tenet of the New Social Studies of Childhood, arguing instead that ‘child’ and ‘childhood’ are socially constructed, and highlighting children’s agency in shaping their social worlds. More complex frameworks have since emerged, whether concerning the need for a relational ontology of ‘child’, or for a recognition of the diversity of childhoods and families globally. Here we extend the debate to engage with the problematic of the very nature of ‘categories’ themselves, to explore how categorical thinking varies across, and is embedded within, linguistic, historical and philosophical processes and world views. Drawing on the examples of the categories of ‘child’ in China, and ‘family’ in Senegal, West Africa, we consider aspects of fluidity in their indigenous linguistic framing, and how their translation into European terms may fail to fully capture their meanings, which may ‘slip away’ in the process. Such ‘gaps’ between divergent linguistic framings include underlying world views, and assumptions about what it means to be human, raising issues of individuality, relationality and connectedness. Through this discussion we raise new questions concerning the processes of categorical thinking in relation to ‘child’ and ‘family’, calling for cautious consideration of what may be ‘unthought’ in these categories as they feature in much of contemporary childhood and family studies.

Item Type:Book or Report Section
Divisions:Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Human Environments
Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
ID Code:103022
Uncontrolled Keywords:Categorical thinking, categories, child, family, cross-cultural, linguistic diversity
Publisher:Emerald Publishing


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation