Accessibility navigation

Inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and thickness in calibrated realistic head models

Antonakakis, M., Schrader, S., Aydin, Ü. ORCID:, Khan, A., Gross, J., Zervakis, M., Rampp, S. and Wolters, C. H. (2020) Inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and thickness in calibrated realistic head models. NeuroImage, 223. 117353. ISSN 1053-8119

[img] Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117353


Skull conductivity has a substantial influence on EEG and combined EEG and MEG source analysis as well as on optimized transcranial electric stimulation. To overcome the use of standard literature values, we propose a non-invasive two-level calibration procedure to estimate skull conductivity individually in a group study with twenty healthy adults. Our procedure requires only an additional run of combined somatosensory evoked potential and field data, which can be easily integrated in EEG/MEG experiments. The calibration procedure uses the P20/N20 topographies and subject-specific realistic head models from MRI. We investigate the inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and relate it to skull thickness, age and gender of the subjects, to the individual scalp P20/N20 surface distance between the P20 potential peak and the N20 potential trough as well as to the individual source depth of the P20/N20 source. We found a considerable inter-subject variability for (calibrated) skull conductivity (8.44 ± 4.84 mS/m) and skull thickness (5.97 ± 1.19 mm) with a statistically significant correlation between them (rho = 0.52). Age showed a statistically significant negative correlation with skull conductivity (rho = -0.5). Furthermore, P20/N20 surface distance and source depth showed large inter-subject variability of 12.08 ± 3.21 cm and 15.45 ± 4.54 mm, respectively, but there was no significant correlation between them. We also found no significant differences among gender subgroups for the investigated measures. It is thus important to take the inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and thickness into account by means of using subject-specific calibrated realistic head modeling.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
ID Code:111223
Uncontrolled Keywords:Adolescent, Adult, Brain/physiology, Calibration, Electric Conductivity, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Scalp/physiology, Skull/physiology, Young Adult

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation