Accessibility navigation


More clues as to the nature of the remedy for breach of trust: Creggy v Barnett

Whayman, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5646 (2017) More clues as to the nature of the remedy for breach of trust: Creggy v Barnett. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2). ISSN 0010-8200

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

192kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Discusses the Court of Appeal's obiter ruling in Barnett v Creggy on whether a claim for equitable compensation for the breach of trust of paying away trust money without authorisation engaged the Limitation Act 1980 s.29(5)(a), with the effect that the trustee's acknowledgement of the debt or other liquidated sum restarted the limitation period. Considers its implications for determining the nature of the remedy for the breach of trust.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:117607
Publisher:Sweet and Maxwell

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation