Accessibility navigation


Working out the priority rules for competing claims to the trustee’s indemnity

Whayman, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5646 (2024) Working out the priority rules for competing claims to the trustee’s indemnity. Journal of Equity, 17 (3). pp. 241-267. ISSN 1833-2137

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 March 2026.

463kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

The trustee’s indemnity, at its simplest, is the right of the trustee to have recourse to trust property for expenses properly incurred in the service of the trust. It is a proprietary right, but there is no legislation determining its priority rules between trust entities. While the rules for priority as between trustees and beneficiaries, trust creditors and personal creditors, and between trustees have been settled by the courts, the others have not.This article therefore considers the possible priority rules and their justifications in those cases. In doing so it sets out the settled rules for convenient reference and basis for further argument. It goes on to consider cases of contests between trust creditors of the same class, between trust creditors of different classes (bearing in mind contractual and legislative provisions limiting recourse to personal assets) and between beneficiary-investors.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:117614
Publisher:LexisNexis Australia

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation