Accessibility navigation


To dispense or not to dispense? Part 3

Brook, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-9731 (2019) To dispense or not to dispense? Part 3. Private Client Business, 2019 (2). pp. 50-56.

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

256kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

This is the third in a series of three linked articles examining the operation of dispensing powers in other common law jurisdictions. In the previous articles (published in Private Client Business Issue 6 of 2018 and Issue 1 of 2019) the different legislative provisions in Australia, New Zealand, the United States (under the Uniform Probate Code) and South Africa were set out, the type of testamentary intention that they required was analysed, and the type of evidence that would prove that intention existed in relation to an informal document was discussed. This final article will consider two final questions that were posed in the first article, namely what standard of proof is required, and when must the testator have held the requisite testamentary intent?

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:117906
Publisher:Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation