Generic enrichment in Plutarch’s lives: an introductionDuff, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-4950 (2025) Generic enrichment in Plutarch’s lives: an introduction. In: Duff, T. E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-4950 and Chrysanthou, C. S. (eds.) Generic Enrichment in Plutarch’s Lives. Routledge, Abingdon and New York, pp. 1-28. ISBN 9780367135355
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.4324/9780429026966
•Adams, S. A. (2013), The genre of Acts and collected biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Adams, S. A. (2020), ‘What are bioi/vitae? Generic self-consciousness in ancient biography’, in De Temmerman (2020a), 33–44.
•Barchiesi, A. (2001), ‘The crossing’, in S. J. Harrison (ed.), Texts, ideas and the classics: scholarship, theory and classical literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–163.
•Beneker, J. (2020), ‘Individual and collected lives in antiquity’, in Temmerman (2020b), 33–44.
•Boter, G. (2015), ‘The title of Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 135, 1–7.
•Boulogne, J. (2008), ‘Les digressions scientifiques dans les Vies de Plutarque’, in Nikolaidis (2008), 733–749.
•Bowden, H. (2018), ‘Alexander as Achilles: Arrian’s use of Homer from Troy to the Granikos’, in T. Howe and F. Pownall (eds.), Ancient Macedonians in the Greek and Roman sources: from history to historiography. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 163–179.
•Bowie, E. (2008). ‘Plutarch’s habits of citation: aspects of difference’, in Nikolaidis (2008), 143–157.
•Bowie, E. L. (1978), ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.16.2, 1652–1699.
•Bowra, C. M. (1960), ‘Euripides’ Epinician for Alcibiades’, Historia 9, 68–79. Reprinted in C. M. Bowra (1972) On Greek margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134–148.
•Breebaart, A. B. (1971), ‘Plutarch and the political development of pericles’, Mnemosyne, ser. 4(24), 260–272.
•Burridge, R. A. (1992), What are the Gospels? A comparison with Graeco-Roman biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Burridge, R. A. (1997a), ‘Biography’, in Porter (1997), 371–391.
•Burridge, R. A. (1997b), ‘The Gospels and Acts’, in Porter (1997), 507–532.
•Chaniotis, A. (1997), ‘Theatricality beyond the theatre: staging public life in the Hellenistic World’, Pallas 47, 219–259.
•Chrysanthou, Ch. (2017), ‘The proems of Plutarch’s Lives and historiography’, Histos 11, 128–153.
•Cohn, D. (1990), ‘Signs of fictionality: A narrative perspective’, Poetics Today 11, 775–804.
•Cohn, D. (1999), The distinction of fiction. Baltimore: Collins.
•Conte, G. B. (1986), The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poetry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
•Cooper, C. (2007), ‘Making irrational myth plausible history: Polybian intertextuality in Plutarch’s Theseus’, Phoenix 61, 212–233.
•Culler, J. (1975), Structuralist poetics. London and New York: Routledge.
•De Lacy, P. (1952), ‘Biography and tragedy in Plutarch’, American Journal of Philology 73, 159–171.
•De Temmerman, K. (2016), ‘Ancient biography and formalities of fiction’, in K. De Temmerman and K. Demoen (eds.), Writing biography in Greece and Rome: narrative technique and fictionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–25.
•De Temmerman, K. (2020a), ‘Ancient Lives: scholarship, definitions, and concepts’, in De Temmerman, K. (2020b), 3–18.
•De Temmerman, K. (2020b), ed., The Oxford handbook of ancient biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Derrida, J. (1980), ‘The law of genre’ (trans. A. Ronell), Critical Inquiry 7, 55–81 and Glyph 7, 202–232. Reprinted in D. Duff (2000), ed., Modern genre theory. Harloe: Longman, 219–231.
•Di Gregorio, L. (1976), ‘Plutarco e la tragedia greca’, Prometheus 2, 151–174.
•Duff, D. (2002), ‘Intertextuality versus genre theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the question of genre’, Paragraph 25, 54–73.
•Duff, T. E. (1996), review of Burridge (1992), in Classical Review NS 46, 265–266.
•Duff, T. E. (1999), Plutarch’s Lives: exploring virtue and vice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Duff, T. E. (2003), ‘Plutarch on the childhood of Alkibiades (Alk. 2–3)’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 49, 89–117.
•Duff, T. E. (2004), ‘Plato, tragedy, the ideal reader and Plutarch’s Demetrios and Antony’, Hermes 132, 271–291.
•Duff, T. E. (2008), ‘The opening of Plutarch’s Life of Themistokles’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 48, 159–179.
•Duff, T. E. (2009), ‘Plato’s Symposium and Plutarch’s Alcibiades’, in J. Ribeiro Ferreira, D. Leão, M. Tröster and P. Barata Dias (eds.), Symposion and philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos, 37–50.
•Duff, T. E. (2011a), ‘Platonic allusion in Plutarch’s Alcibiades 4–7’, in P. Millett, S. P. Oakley and J. E. Thompson (eds.), Ratio et res ipsa: Classical essays presented by former pupils to James Diggle on his retirement. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society, 27–43.
•Duff, T. E. (2011b), ‘The structure of the Plutarchan book’, Classical Antiquity 30, 213–278.
•Duff, T. E. (2022), ‘Alcibiades and the city’, in L. Athanasaki and F. Titchener (eds.), Plutarch’s cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141–165.
•Duff, T. E. and Scott-Kilvert, I. (2012), Plutarch: The age of Alexander. London: Penguin.
•Farrell, J. (2003), ‘Classical genre in theory and practice’, New Literary History 34, 383–408.
•Fletcher, J. and Hanink, R. (2016), eds., Creative Lives in classical antiquity: poets, artists and biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Focke, F. (1923), ‘Synkrisis’, Hermes 58, 327–368.
•Fournel, E. (2016), ‘Dream narratives in Plutarch’s Lives: the place of fiction in biography’. In V. Liotsakis and S. T. Farrington (eds.), The art of history: literary perspectives on Greek and Roman historiography. Berlin: De Gruyter, 199–216.
•Fowler, A. (1982), Kinds of literature: an introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Fowler, D. P. (1997), ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and Classical Studies’, Materiali e Discussioni per l'Analisi dei Testi Classici 39, 13–34.
•Frazier, F. (1996), Histoire et morale dans les Vies Parallèles de Plutarque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Second edition 2016
•Frow, J. (2006), Genre. London: Routledge.
•Fuhrer, T. (2013), ‘Hypertexts and auxiliary texts: new genres in late antiquity’, in Papanghelis, Harrison and Frangoulidis (2013), 79–89.
•Geiger, J. (1985), Cornelius Nepos and ancient political biography (Historia Einzelschriften 47). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
•Gentili, B. and Cerri, G. (1978), ‘L’idea di biografia nel pensiero greco’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 27, 7–27 and Studi Storici 19, 1978, 45–60. Reprinted in an English translation in Gentili and Cerri (1988), 61–85.
•Gentili, B. and Cerri, G. (1988), History and biography in ancient thought (London Studies in Classical Philology 20). Amsterdam: Gieben. First published (1983) as Storia e biografia nel pensiero antico. Rome and Bari: Laterza.
•Georgiadou, A. (1988), ‘The Lives of the Caesars and Plutarch’s other Lives’, Illinois Classical Studies 13.2, 349–356.
•Georgiadou, A. (2014), ‘The Lives of the Caesars’, in M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 251–266.
•Giannattasio Andria, R. (2000), ‘Galba e Otone tra biografia e storia’, in I. Gallo and C. Moreschini (eds.), I generi letterari in Plutarco. Atti del VIII Convegno plutarcheo, Pisa, 2–4 giugno 1999. Naples: D’Auria, 81–91.
•Goldhill, S. (2008), ‘Genre’, in T. Whitmarsh (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Greek and Roman novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–200.
•Guillén Selfa, L. (1997), ‘Plutarco: moralidad y tragedia’, in C. Schrader, V. Ramón and J. Vela (eds.), Plutarco y la historia. Actas del V simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Zaragoza 20–22 de junio de 1996. Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza, 241–253.
•Hadjittofi, F. and Lefteratou, A. (2020), eds., The genres of late antique Christian poetry: between modulations and transpositions. Berlin: De Gruyter.
•Hamilton, C. D. (1992), ‘Plutarch’s “Life of Agesilaus”’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.33.6, 4201–4221.
•Hamilton, C. D. (1994), ‘Plutarch and Xenophon on Agesilaus’, Ancient World 25, 205–212.
•Harrison, S. J. (2007), Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Harrison, S. J. (2013), ‘Introduction’, in Papanghelis, Harrison and Frangoulidis (2013), 1–15.
•Heath, S. (2004), ‘The politics of genre’, in C. Prendergast (ed.), Debating world literature. London and New York: Verso, 163–174.
•Hillman, T. P. (1994), ‘Authorial statements, narrative, and character in Plutarch’s Agesilaus - Pompeius’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 35, 255–280.
•Hurley, D. W. (2014), ‘Suetonius’ rubric sandwich’, in T. Power, and R. K. Gibson, (eds.), Suetonius the biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–37.
•Hutchinson, G. (2013), ‘Genre and super-genre’, in Papanghelis, Harrison and Frangoulidis (2013), 19–34.
•Jauss, H. R. (1967), Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Litteraturwissenschaft. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.
•Jones, C. P. (1993), ‘Greek drama in the Roman Empire’, in Scodel, R. (ed.), Theater and society in the Classical world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 39–52. Reprinted in G. Nagy (2001), ed., Greek literature, viii. Greek literature in the Roman period and late antiquity. Oxford and New York: Routledge, 205–218.
•Kebric, R. B. (1977), In the shadow of Macedon: Duris of Samos (Historia Einzelschriften 29). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
•Kebric, R. B. (2015), ‘Caesar, Duris of Samos and the death of “tragic history”’, in V. Naas, and M. Simon (eds.), De Samos à Rome: personnalité et influence de Douris. Paris: Presses Universitaire de Pairs Ouest, 341–359.
•Kirkland, N. B. (2022), Herodotus and imperial Greek literature: Criticism, imitation, reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Kokolakis, M. (1960), ‘Lucian and the tragic performances in his time’, Platon 12, 67–107.
•Kroll, W. (1924), Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Stuttgart: Metzler.
•Lefkowitz, M. R. (1981), The lives of the Greek poets. London: Duckworth.
•Lefteratou, A. (2020), ‘Plutarch’s less tragic heroes: drama and epic in the Pelopidas’, in Schmidt, Vamvouri and Hirsch-Luipold (2020), 421–439.
•Leo, F. (1901), Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. Leipzig: Teubner.
•Marincola, J. (2001), Greek historians (Greece and Rome: New Surveys in the Classics 31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Marincola, J. (2007), ed., A companion to Greek and Roman historiography, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moles, J. L. (1989), review of Geiger (1985), in Classical Review NS 39, 229–233.
Momigliano, A. (1971), The development of Greek biography. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mossman, J. (2015), ‘Dressed for success: clothing in Plutarch’s Demetrius’, in R. Ash, J. Mossman, and F. B. Titchener (eds.), Fame and infamy: essays for Christopher Pelling on characterization in Greek and Roman biography and history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 149–160.
Mossman, J. M. (1988), ‘Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Alexander’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 108, 83–93. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 209–228.
Mossman, J. M. (1992), ‘Plutarch, Pyrrhus and Alexander’, in P. A. Stadter (ed.), Plutarch and the historical tradition. London and New York: Routledge, 90–108.
Most, G. W. 2000), ‘Generating genres: the ideas of the tragic’, in M. Depew and D. Obbink (eds.), Matrices of genre: authors, canons, and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 15–35.
•Nikolaidis, A. G. (2008), ed., The unity of Plutarch’s work: ‘Moralia’ themes in the ‘Lives’, features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’. Berlin: De Gruyter.
•Papanghelis, Th. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis, S. (2013), eds., Generic interfaces in Latin literature: encounters, interactions and transformations. Berlin: De Gruyter.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (1988), ed., Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (1990a), ‘Childhood and personality in Greek biography’, in idem (ed.), Characterization and individuality in Greek literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–244. Reprinted with revisions and postscript in Pelling (2002a), 301–338.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (1990b), ‘Truth and fiction in Plutarch’s Lives’, in D. A. Russell (ed.), Antonine literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–52. Reprinted with revisions in Pelling (2002a), 143–170.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (1997), ‘Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early Principate’, in M. J. Edwards and S. Swain (eds.), Portraits: biographical representation in the Greek and Latin literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–144.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (1999), ‘“Making myth look like history”: Plato in Plutarch’s Theseus-Romulus’, in A. Pérez Jiménez, J. García López and R. Ma Aguilar (eds., 1997), Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles. Actas del V Congreso Internacional de la I.P.S. (Madrid-Cuenca, 4–7 de mayo de 1999). Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 431–443. Reprinted with revisions in Pelling (2002a), 171–195.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2002a), Plutarch and history: eighteen studies. London: Duckworth and the Classical Press of Wales.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2002b), Plutarch’s Caesar: a Caesar for the Caesars?’, in P. A. Stadter and L. Van der Stockt (eds., 2002), Sage and emperor: Plutarch and Greek intellectuals in the time of Trajan. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 213–226. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 253–265.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2006), ‘Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar’, in B. McGing and J. M. Mossman (eds.), The limits of ancient biography. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 255–280.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2009a), ‘Biography’, in G. Boys-Stones, B. Graziosi and P. Vasunia (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Hellenic studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 608–616.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2009b), ‘Seeing a Roman tragedy through Greek eyes: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar’, in S. Goldhill and E. Hall (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek tragic tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 264–288.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2010), ‘Plutarch’s “tale of two cities”: do the Parallel Lives combine as global histories?’, in N. Humble (ed.), Plutarch’s Lives: Parallelism and purpose. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 217–235.
•Pelling, C. B. R. (2020), ‘Intertextuality in Plutarch: what’s the point?’, in Schmidt, Vamvouri and Hirsch-Luipold (2020), 11–27.
•Pitts, A. W. (2020), ‘The Fowler fallacy: biography, history, and the genre of Luke-Acts’, Journal of Biblical Literature 139, 341–359.
•Pollmann, K. (2017), The baptized Muse: early Christian poetry as cultural authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Polman, G. H. (1974), ‘Chronological biography and akmē in Plutarch’, Classical Philology 69, 169–177.
•Porter, S. E. (1997), ed., Handbook of Classical rhetoric in the Hellenistic period 330 BC–AD 400. Leiden: Brill.
•Russell, D. A. (1966), ‘Plutarch, “Alcibiades” 1–16’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 192, 37–47. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 191–207.
•Russell, D. A. (1981), Criticism in antiquity. London: Duckworth.
•Rutherford, R. B. (2007), ‘Tragedy and history’, in Marincola (2007), ii, 504–514.
•Scardigli, B. (1995), ed., Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Schepens, G. (1994), ‘Politics and belief in Timaeus of Tauromenium’, Ancient Society 25, 249–278.
•Schepens, G. (2000), ‘Rhetoric in Plutarch’s Life of Pyrrhus’, in L. Van der Stockt (ed.), Rhetorical theory and praxis in Plutarch: acta of the IVth International Congress of the International Plutarch Society, Leuven, July 3–6, 1996. Leuven and Namur: Peeters, 413–442.
•Schmidt, T. S., Vamvouri, M. R. Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2020), eds., The dynamics of intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden: Brill.
•Schorn, S. (2004), Satyros aus Kallatis. Sammlung der Fragmente mit Kommentar. Basel: Schwabe.
•Shipley, D. R. (1997), Plutarch’s Life of Agesilaos: response to sources in the presentation of character. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Stadter, P. A. (1967), ‘Flavius Arrianus: the new Xenophon’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 8, 155–161.
•Stadter, P. A. (1975), ‘Plutarch’s comparison of Pericles and Fabius Maximus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 16, 77–85. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 155–164.
•Stadter, P. A. (1987), ‘The rhetoric of Plutarch’s Pericles’, Ancient Society 18, 251–269.
•Stadter, P. A. (1991), ‘Fictional narrative in the Cyropaedeia’, American Journal of Philology 112, 461–491.
•Stadter, P. A. (1996), ‘Anecdotes and the thematic structure of Plutarchean biography’, in J. A. Fernández Delgado and F. Pordomingo Pardo (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos formales. Actas del IV Simposio Español sobre Plutarco. Salamanca, 26 a 28 de Mayo de 1994. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 291–303.
•Stadter, P. A. (2007). ‘Biography and history’ in Marincola (2007), ii, 528–540.
•Stadter, P. A. (2008), ‘Notes and anecdotes: observations on cross-genre apophthegmata’, in Nikolaidis (2008), 53–66.
•Volpe Cacciatore, P. (1991), ‘Funzione dell’epigramma in Plutarco: l’esempio del “De Herodoti malignitate”’, in G. d’Ippolito and I. Gallo (eds.), Strutture formali dei Moralia di Plutarco. Atti del III Convegno plutarcheo, Palermo, 3–5 maggio 1989. Naples: D’Auria, 187–194.
•Vorhis, J. G. (2017), ‘The best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch’. Dissertation: University of California at Los Angeles.
•White, H. V. (1974), ‘The historical text as literary artifact’, Clio 3, 277–303. Reprinted in R. H. Canary and H. Kozicki (eds.), The writing of history: literary form and historical understanding. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 41–62. Also reprinted in White (1978), 83–100, and in G. Roberts (2001), ed. The history and narrative reader. London: Routledge, 221–236.
•White, H. V. (1976), ‘The fictions of factual representation’, in A. Fletcher (ed.), The literature of fact. New York: Columbia University Press, 21–44. Reprinted White (1978), 121–134.
•White, H. V. (1978), Tropics of discourse: essays in culture and criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
•White, H. (2003), ‘Anomalies of genre: the utility of theory and history for the study of literary genres’, New Literary History 34, 597–615.
•Whitmarsh, T. (2005), ‘The Greek novels: titles and genre’, American Journal of Philology 126, 587–611.
•Whittington, L. (2017), ‘Shakespeare and the Greeks: theatricality and performance from Plutarch’s Lives to Coriolanus’, Classics Receptions Journal 9, 120–143.
•Whitton, C. (2020), ‘Biography and praise in Trajanic Rome: Tacitus’ Agricola and Pliny’s Panegyricus’, in De Temmerman (2020b), 152–168.
•Zucker, A. (2009), ‘Les citations dans le Dialogue sur l’amour (Eroticos logos) de Plutarque’, Rursus 4 [online] University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |