Towards a conceptual framework for understanding deliberative urban health adaptation planning (DUHAP) in U.K. cities: a review

[thumbnail of maxwell-et-al-2025-towards-a-conceptual-framework-for-understanding-deliberative-urban-health-adaptation-planning.pdf]
Text
- Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Maxwell, K., Dixon, T. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-6337 and Carpenter, J. (2025) Towards a conceptual framework for understanding deliberative urban health adaptation planning (DUHAP) in U.K. cities: a review. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy, 3 (2). pp. 305-329. ISSN 2816-7414 doi: 10.3138/jccpe-2024-0008

Abstract/Summary

This review article examines the climate adaptation and public health nexus by exploring the role of deliberative democracy within U.K. cities. A deliberative democratic approach is increasingly being applied by local governments through citizens’ assemblies and citizens’ juries to overcome problems that democracies face when dealing with the complexity of climate change actions. The article aims, in the context of U.K. cities, (a) to explore the role of deliberative democracy in integrating public health considerations into urban climate policies, (b) to identify how deliberative democracy has been applied within U.K. local authorities, and (c) to develop a conceptual framework for deliberative urban health adaptation planning (DUHAP) to guide further research. Using secondary data from academic literature and policy sources, key themes in urban climate-health governance are reviewed. The findings illustrate deliberative democracy’s potential role in urban adaptation and health planning. From the emerging themes, good-practice examples (Bristol and Manchester) are selected to provide evidence of deliberative democracy in action. From the review, the article presents a DUHAP conceptual framework for further research on deliberative democracy. The authors highlight the opportunities for integrating public health objectives into adaptation planning to realize wider co-benefits, as well as the challenges with a deliberative democracy approach. The approach requires more joined-up thinking between stakeholders and agencies toward the co-production of effective adaptation-health policies and improved resources from the central government for place-based actions. These findings are useful for both practitioners and academics to better understand how to meaningfully engage with citizens on urban adaptation and public health policy.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/123013
Identification Number/DOI 10.3138/jccpe-2024-0008
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Urban Living group
Publisher University of Toronto Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record