Assessing sugarcane farmers’ intentions towards World Trade Organisation-driven sugar sector policy reforms in Thailand

Downloads

[1] USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Sugar: World Markets and Trade 2023. Available from: https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/z029p472x/4x51k466h/r207w7721/sugar.pdf. [2] Bank of Thailand (BOT), EC_XT_009_S3 Value and volume of exported products by production activities (US dollar) (In Thai), 2024. Available from: https://app.bot.or.th/BTWS_STAT/statistics/BOTWEBSTAT.aspx?reportID=979&language=TH. (Accessed 23 September 2024). [3] Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), Information: Agricultural economics by product 2020 (In Thai). Agricultural Statistics Document No. 402, Office of Agricultural Economics Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand, 2021. Available from: http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/ebook/2563/commodity2562.pdf. [4] Office of the Cane and Sugar Board (OCSB), Cane area and yield report (In Thai), 2024. Available from: https://www.ocsb.go.th/report_area_yield/. (Accessed 15 October 2024). [5] P. Manivong, E. Bourgois, White paper: Thai sugarcane sector and sustainability. FairAgora, 2017. Available from: https://www.bonsucro.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Thai-White-Paper-FINAL-LowRes.docx.pdf. [6] K. Chow, Prospects Looking Sweet for Growing the Thai Sugar Industry. RaboResearch, 2016. Available from: https://research.rabobank.com/publicationservice/download/publication/token/MEP9ir97sDzw2CJdtpAs. [7] World Trade Organization (WTO), Thailand – Subsidies On Sugar Request For Consultations By Brazil. G/AG/GEN/131;G/L/1146;G/SCM/D110/1;WT/DS507/1, 2016. Available from: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=304487,228305,228243,227996&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=3&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True. [8] World Trade Organization (WTO), Thailand – Subsidies On Sugar Notification Of A Mutually Agreed Solution. G/AG/GEN/131/Add.1;G/L/1146/Add.1;G/SCM/D110/1/Add.1;WT/DS507/4, 2024. Available from: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=304487,228305,228243,227996&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True. [9] D. Viaggi, M. Raggi, S. Gomez y Paloma, Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts, J. Policy Model. 33 (1) (2011) 127-145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.004. [10] J.P. Breen, T.C. Hennessy, F.S. Thorne, The effect of decoupling on the decision to produce: An Irish case study, Food Policy 30 (2) (2005) 129-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.03.001. [11] D.R. Harvey, Farmers' intentions survey, 1994-1997: Final report. Special Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 47, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2000. Available from: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20003013102. [12] R. Tranter, L. Costa, T. Knapp, J. Little, M. Sottomayor, Asking farmers about their response to the proposed bond scheme, in: A. Swinbank and R. Tranter, A bond scheme for common agricultural policy reform, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851997445.0127. [13] E. Douarin, A. Bailey, S. Davidova, M. Gorton, L. Latruffe, Structural, location and human capital determinants of farmers’ response to decoupled payments. Working papers hal-02822652, 2007. Available from: https://hal.science/hal-02822652/. [14] M. Raggi, L. Sardonini, D. Viaggi, The effects of the Common Agricultural Policy on exit strategies and land re-allocation, Land Use Policy 31 (2013) 114-125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.12.009. [15] A. Meriot, Thailand’s sugar policy: government drives production and export expansion. No. SE 1404 -10, the American Sugar Alliance, USA, 2015. Available from: https://sugaralliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Meriot-Thai-Subsidy-062015.pdf. [16] N. Khumla, S. Sakuanrungsirikul, P. Punpee, T. Hamarn, T. Chaisan, L. Soulard, P. Songsri, Sugarcane breeding, germplasm development and supporting genetics research in Thailand, Sugar Tech 24 (1) (2022) 193-209, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00996-2. [17] H.G. Jensen, H. Zobbe, Consequences of reducing limits on aggregate measurements of support, in: K. Anderson and W. Martin, Agricultural trade reform & the doha development agenda, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2006, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/202871468318342109/841401968_200510313024112/additional/34206.pdf. [18] USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Thailand Sugar Annual 2017. GAIN Report Number: TH7045, 2017. Available from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Sugar%20Annual_Bangkok_Thailand_4-12-2017.pdf. [19] K. Siddiqui, International trade, WTO and economic development, WRPE 7 (4) (2016) 424-450, https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.7.4.0424. [20] P.R. Krugman, Is free trade passé?, JEP 1 (2) (1987) 131-144, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.1.2.131. [21] World Trade Organization (WTO), Understanding the WTO, 5th ed. WTO Publications, Geneva, 2015. [22] International Labour Organization (ILO), Working and employment conditions in the agriculture sector in Thailand: A survey of migrants working on Thai sugarcane, rubber, oil palm and maize farms. Thailand, 2021. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40asia/%40ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_844317.pdf. [23] I. Marković, M. Marković, Agricultural protectionism of the European Union in the conditions of international trade liberalization, EP 61 (2) (2014) 423-440, https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1402423M. [24] H. Řezbová, M. Maitah, O. Sergienko, EU quota sugar market concentration–the main drivers of EU sugar market, Agris On-line Pap. Econ. Inform. vol. 7 (4) (2015) 131-142, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.231900. [25] I. Benešová, H. Řezbová, L. Smutka, K. Tomšík, A. Laputková, European sugar market–impact of quota system, Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 63 (6) (2015) 1825-1838, https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563061825. [26] J. Windle, J. Rolfe, Growers' Perspectives on the Viability of Sugarcane Farming Systems in Central Queensland, AUSTRALAS AGRIBUS RE 13 (2005), https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.126401. [27] T. Josling, Issues for Upcoming Multilateral Negotiations on Agriculture and Recommendations for CARICOM Preparatory Work. IICA Biblioteca, Venezuela, 1998. Available from: https://repositorio.iica.int/bitstream/handle/11324/15375/BVE21041092i.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [28] K. Itharattana, Effects of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture in Thailand: Institutional and Structural Aspects, in: Working Paper No.39, The CGPRT Centre, Bangkok, 1999. https://repository.unescap.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12870/5878/ESCAP-1999-WP-Effects-trade-liberalization-agriculture-Thailand.pdf?sequence=4. (Accessed 14 December 2022). [29] A. Elobeid, J. Beghin, Multilateral trade and agricultural policy reforms in sugar markets, J. Agric. Econ. 57 (1) (2006) 23-48, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00030.x. [30] OECD, Sugar Policy Reform in the European Union and in World Sugar Markets. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040212-en. [31] D. Talukder, A Survey on Agricultural Trade Liberalisation in Thailand, Southeast Asian J. Econ. 1 (1) (2013) 49-66, Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/saje/article/view/48749. [32] M.C. Ahearn, J. Yee, P. Korb, Effects of differing farm policies on farm structure and dynamics, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87 (5) (2005) 1182-1189, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00805.x. [33] K. Happe, A. Balmann, K. Kellermann, C. Sahrbacher, Does structure matter? The impact of switching the agricultural policy regime on farm structures, J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 67 (2) (2008) 431-444, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.009. [34] M. Genius, G. Karagiannis, V. Tzouvelakas, Assessing European farmers’ intentions in the light of the 2003 CAP reform. in: 109th European Association of Agricultural Economics (EAAE) Seminar “The CAP after the Fischer Reform: National Implementations”. Impact Assessment and the Agenda for Future Reforms. 20-21 November 2008; Viterbo, Italy. 2008. p. 1-16. [35] L. Latruffe, C. Le Mouël, Capitalization of government support in agricultural land prices: What do we know?, J. Econ. Surv. 23 (4) (2009) 659-691, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00575.x. [36] S.J. Goetz, D.L. Debertin, Why farmers quit: a county‐level analysis, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83 (4) (2001) 1010-1023, https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00226. [37] A.K. Mishra, J.M. Fannin, H. Joo, Off‐farm work, intensity of government payments, and farm exits: Evidence from a national survey in the United States, Can. J. Agric. Econ. 62 (2014) 283-306, https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12027. [38] N.D. Key, M.J. Roberts, Do government payments influence farm size and survival?, J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 32 (2) (2007) 330-348, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.8645. [39] D. Peel, H.L. Berry, J. Schirmer, Farm exit intention and wellbeing: a study of Australian farmers, J. Rural Stud. 47 (2016) 41-51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.006. [40] M. Gorton, E. Douarin, S. Davidova, L. Latruffe, Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: A comparison of farmers in selected established and new Member States, J. Rural Stud. 24 (3) (2008) 322-336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.001. [41] L. Saint-Cyr, Accounting for unobserved farm heterogeneity in modelling structural change: Evidence from France [PhD thesis]. France: Loire Bretagne University; 2016. [42] E. Paroissien, L. Latruffe, L. Piet, Early exit from business, performance and neighbours’ influence: a study of farmers in France, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 48 (5) (2021) 1132-1161, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab008. [43] J.-P. Chavas, Chapter 5 Structural change in agricultural production: economics, technology and policy, Handb. Agric. Econ. 1 (Part A) (2001) 263-285, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10008-3. [44] A. Kimhi, R. Bollman, Family farm dynamics in Canada and Israel: the case of farm exits, Agric. Econ 21 (1) (1999) 69-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(99)00015-8. [45] A. Zimmermann, T. Heckelei, I.P. Domínguez, Modelling farm structural change for integrated ex-ante assessment: review of methods and determinants, Environ. Sci. Policy 12 (2009) 601-618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.014. [46] G. Stokstad, Exit from farming and land abandonment in Northern Norway. in: The 116th EAAE seminar "Spatial Dynamics in Agri-food Systems: Implications for Sustainability and Consumer Welfare". 27th-30th October; Parma, Italy. 2010. p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.95343. [47] S. Neuenfeldt, A. Gocht, T. Heckelei, P. Ciaian, Explaining farm structural change in the European agriculture: a novel analytical framework, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 46 (5) (2019) 713-768, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jby037. [48] H. Storm, K. Mittenzwei, Farm survival and direct payments in the Norwegian farm sector. Discussion paper No. 2013-5, Norway, 2013. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/reader/285987560. [49] J.M. MacDonald, P. Korb, R.A. Hoppe, Farm size and the organization of US crop farming. ERR-152, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., 2013. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45108/39359_err152.pdf. [50] K. De Roest, P. Ferrari, K. Knickel, Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways, J. Rural Stud. 59 (2018) 222-231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.013. [51] C.R. Weiss, W. Briglauer, Determinants and dynamics of farm diversification. in: the Xth EAAE Congress ‘Exploring Diversity in the European Agri-Food System’. 28th-31st August; Zaragoza, Spain. 2002. p. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.24929. [52] V. Chatellier, Price volatility, market regulation and risk management: challenges for the future of the CAP, in: [University work] auto-saisine, 2011. https://hal.science/hal-01466968/document. [53] I. Darnhofer, Resilience and why it matters for farm management, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 41 (3) (2014) 461-484, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu012. [54] R.A. Hoppe, Structure and finances of US farms: Family Farm Report, 2014 Edition. EIB-132, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., 2014. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/43913/50364_eib-132.pdf?v=. [55] M. Boehlje, Alternative models of structural change in agriculture and related industries, Agribusiness 8 (3) (1992) 219-231, https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6297(199205)8:3<219::AID-AGR2720080303>3.0.CO;2-T. [56] E. Goddard, A. Weersink, K. Chen, C.G. Turvey, Economics of structural change in agriculture, Can. J. Agric. Econ. 41 (4) (1993) 475-489, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1993.tb03772.x. [57] M. Lobley, C. Potter, Agricultural change and restructuring: recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England, J. Rural Stud. 20 (4) (2004) 499-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.07.001. [58] G. Breustedt, T. Glauben, Driving forces behind exiting from farming in Western Europe, J. Agric. Econ. 58 (1) (2007) 115-127, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00082.x. [59] M. Lobley, A. Butler, The impact of CAP reform on farmers’ plans for the future: Some evidence from South West England, Food Policy 35 (4) (2010) 341-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.001. [60] A.K. Mishra, M. Raggi, D. Viaggi, Determinants of farm exit: A comparison between Europe and United States. in: the 114th EAAE Seminar ‘Structural Change in Agriculture’. 15th-16th April; Berlin, Germany. 2010. p. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.61075. [61] L. Latruffe, A. Dupuy, Y. Desjeux, What would farmers' strategies be in a no-CAP situation? An illustration from two regions in France, J. Rural Stud. 32 (2013) 10-25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.003. [62] A. Barnes, L.-A. Sutherland, L. Toma, K. Matthews, S. Thomson, The effect of the Common Agricultural Policy reforms on intentions towards food production: Evidence from livestock farmers, Land Use Policy 50 (2016) 548-558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.017. [63] S.J. Goetz, M. Davlasheridze, State‐Level Cooperative Extension Spending and Farmer Exits, AEPP 39 (1) (2017) 65-86, https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppw007. [64] R. Suchato, A. Patoomnakul, N. Photchanaprasert, Alternative cropping adoption in Thailand: A case study of rice and sugarcane production, Heliyon 7 (12) (2021) e08629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08629. [65] J.M. Wooldridge, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd ed. MIT press, Massachusetts, 2010. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhcfr. [66] W.H. Greene, Econometric analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2003. https://www.ctanujit.org/uploads/2/5/3/9/25393293/_econometric_analysis_by_greence.pdf. [67] D.J. Finney, Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 1952. [68] G. Young, Maximum likelihood estimation and factor analysis, Psychometrika 6 (1) (1941) 49-53, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288574. [69] W.E. Becker, D.M. Waldman, A graphical interpretation of probit coefficients, J. Econ. Educ. 20 (4) (1989) 371-378, https://doi.org/10.2307/1182687. [70] Khon Kaen University (KKU), Project on production cost management and knowledge transfer to reduce farmers’ sugarcane production costs in Crop year 2014/15 (In Thai). Final report, Thailand, 2014. Available from: https://old.ocsb.go.th/upload/learning/fileupload/5336-6947.pdf. [71] K. Kuldilok, The determination of organic practice and adoption in sugarcane farming in Thailand, Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 42 (3) (2021) 694–701, Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/253495. [72] Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), Agricultural Statistics of Thailand 2021 (In Thai). Thailand, 2021. Available from: https://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2565/yearbook2564.pdf. [73] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), FAO trade policy technical notes No. 6- Sugar: the impact of reforms to sugar sector policies a guide to contemporary analyses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Italy, 2004. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/j5586e/j5586e00.pdf. [74] A. Gohin, J.-C. Bureau, Modelling the EU sugar supply to assess sectoral policy reforms, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 33 (2) (2006) 223-247, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbl006. [75] P. Jansuwan, K.K. Zander, What to do with the farmland? Coping with ageing in rural Thailand, J. Rural Stud. 81 (2021) 37-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.12.003. [76] A. Ferjani, A. Zimmermann, A. Roesch, Determining factors of farm exit in agriculture in Switzerland, Agric. Econ. Rev. 16 (1) (2015) 59-72, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.253691. [77] J. Prasara-A, S.H. Gheewala, An assessment of social sustainability of sugarcane and cassava cultivation in Thailand, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 27 (2021) 372-382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.009. [78] J.A. Ouellette, W. Wood, Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior, Psychol. Bull. 124 (1) (1998) 54-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54. [79] W. Arjchariyaartong, The Competitiveness of the sugar industry in Thailand [PhD Thesis]. Germany: Universität Göttingen; 2007. [80] A. Hejnowicz, M. Rudd, P.C. White, A survey exploring private farm advisor perspectives of agri-environment schemes: The case of England’s Environmental Stewardship programme, Land Use Policy 55 (2016) 240-256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.005. [81] A. Daxini, M. Ryan, C. O’Donoghue, A.P. Barnes, Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour, Land Use Policy 85 (2019) 428-437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.002. [82] B. Agarwal, A. Agrawal, Do farmers really like farming? Indian farmers in transition, Oxf. Dev. Stud. 45 (4) (2017) 460-478, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2017.1283010. [83] W. Sawaengsak, S.H. Gheewala, Analysis of social and socio-economic impacts of sugarcane production: A case study in Nakhon Ratchasima province of Thailand, J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017) 1169-1175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.148. [84] M. Udomkerdmongkol, N. Chalermpao. Thai Agricultural Sector: From Problems to Solutions. United Nations Thailand 2020 [Accessed 8 Novermber 2022]; Available from: https://thailand.un.org/en/103307-thai-agricultural-sector-problems-solutions. [85] J. Prasara-A, S.H. Gheewala, Sustainability of sugarcane cultivation: case study of selected sites in north-eastern Thailand, J. Clean. Prod. 134 (2016) 613-622, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.029. [86] J. Sasarose, P. Naraphorn, W. Papis, K. Piya, Factors Affecting Crop Choices in Thailand: Rice or Sugarcane?, IEMS 22 (3) (2023) 244-258, https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2023.22.3.244. [87] Office of the Cane and Sugar Board (OCSB), Report on sugarcane cultivation situation 2022/23 (In Thai). Bangkok, Thailand, 2023. Available from: https://www.ocsb.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%93%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AD%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95-2565-66.pdf. [88] Krungsri, Industry Outlook 2023-2025: Sugar Industry. Krungsri Research, Thailand, 2023. Available from: https://www.krungsri.com/en/research/industry/industry-outlook/agriculture/sugar/io/sugar-2023-2025. [89] D. Bougherara, L. Latruffe, Potential impact of the EU 2003 CAP reform on land idling decisions of French landowners: Results from a survey of intentions, Land Use Policy 27 (4) (2010) 1153-1159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.005. [90] J. Nobel, Policy scenarios for EU sugar market reform. IP/B/AGRI/IC/2012-60 PE 495.823, The European Parliament, Brussels, 2012. Available from: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1333900/policy-scenarios-for-eu-sugar-market-reform/1938735/. [91] K. Pietola, M. Väre, A.O. Lansink, Timing and type of exit from farming: farmers' early retirement programmes in Finland, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 30 (1) (2003) 99-116, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/30.1.99. [92] J. Davis, P. Caskie, M. Wallace, Promoting structural adjustment in agriculture: The economics of New Entrant Schemes for farmers, Food Policy 40 (2013) 90-96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.02.006.