Actionable information and climate change awareness drive consumer selection of environmentally beneficial garden plant
McLaughlin, C., Blanusa, T., Cameron, R. W.F., Lukac, M.
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Abstract/SummaryDomestic gardens worldwide cover approximately 15-30% of residential urban space and with the appropriate plant composition, have potential to help manage urban water flows, regulate temperatures and air-pollution. However, the provision of these regulating ecosystem services depends upon the preferences and willingness of private garden owners to adopt environmentally beneficial planting, with associated traits that confer these benefits. This study tested whether the way information on beneficial plant traits is presented influences taxa choices. In an experimental online survey, participants were divided into two groups: one received only ‘system information’ (basic facts about environmental problems: climate change, urban flooding, and poor air quality, n = 208), while the other also received ‘action-related information’ (how to potentially address environmental problems by choosing plants with certain traits, n = 211). Receiving ‘action-related information’ significantly influenced plant taxa selection; fewer choices were made for ornamental plants without traits that are beneficial for flood or pollution mitigation. Additionally, participants concerned about climate change were more willing to choose environmentally beneficial taxa, regardless of information group. These findings indicate that pro-environmental planting choices in domestic gardens can be encouraged by providing actionable information and linking to existing climate change concerns.
1. Adu-Gyamfi, G., Song, H., Obuobi, B., Niketiah, E., Wang, H. & Cudjoe, D. (2022). ‘Who will adopt? Investigating the adoption intention for battery swap technology for electric vehicles’, Renewable and Sustainably Energy Reviews. 156, 111979.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). ‘The Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50, pp. 179-211.
3. Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F. & Falk, A. (2024). ‘Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action’, Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 253–259 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01925
4. Baudry, J. & Yu, Z. (1999). ‘Landscape patterns changes in two subtropical Chinese villages as related to farming policies’, Crit Rev Plant Sci 18(3):373–380.
5. Beidokhti, A.N. & Moore, T.L. (2021). ‘The effects of precipitation, tree phenology, lead area index, and bark characteristics on throughfall rates by urban trees: A meta-data analysis’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 60, 127052.
6. Berger, J., Essah, E., Blanuša, T. & Beaman, C.P. (2022). ‘The appearance of indoor plants and their effects on people’s perceptions of indoor air quality and subjective well-being’, Building and Environment. 219, 109151.
7. Beth Chatto’s Plants & Gardens (2022a). Top 12 drought-resistant plants. Available at: https://www.bethchatto.co.uk/discover/our-blog/guides/top-12-drought-resistant- plants.htm (Accessed 30 July 2024).
8. Birau, M.M. & Faure, C. (2018). ‘It is easy to do the right thing: Avoiding the backfiring effects of advertisements that blame consumers for waste’, Journal of Business Research. 87, pp. 102-117.
9. Bird, S., Baldock K., Bostock, H. & Salisbury, A. (2016). ‘Which pollinator friendly plants are grown in UK gardens?’ 2016 Survey Report. London, UK: Royal Horticultural Society, Internal report.
10. Blanuša, T. & Hadley, J. (2019). ‘Impact of plant choice on rainfall runoff delay and reduction by hedge species’, Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 15, pp. 401-411.
11. Blanuša, T., Qadir, Z.J., Kaur, A., Hadley, J. & Gush, M.B. (2020). ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of urban hedges as air pollution barriers: Importance of sampling method, species characteristics and site location’, Environments. 7 (10), 81.
12. Brant, R. (1990). ‘Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression’, Biometrics, 46, pp. 1171–1178.
13. Cambridge Dictionary (2025). Garden. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/garden (Accessed 14 September 2025).
14. Cameron, R. (2023). ‘“Do we need to see gardens in a new light?” Recommendations for policy and practice to improve the ecosystem services derived from domestic gardens’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 80, 127820.
15. Cameron, R.W.F. & Blanuša, T. (2016). ‘Green infrastructure and ecosystem services - is the devil in the detail?’, Annals of Botany. 118, pp. 377-391.
16. Cameron, R. & Hitchmough, J., (2016). Environmental Horticulture: Science and Management of Green Landscapes. CABI
17. Cameron, R.W.F., Harrison-Murray, R.S., Atkinson, C.J. & Judd, H.L. (2006). ‘Regulated deficit irrigation - a means to control growth in woody ornamentals’, The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 81 (3), pp. 435-443.
18. Cameron, R., Blanuša, T., Taylor, J., Salisbury, A., Halstead, A., Henricot, B. & Thompson, K. (2012). ‘The domestic garden: its contribution to urban green infrastructure’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 11 (2), pp. 129-137.
19. Cameron, R.W.F., Taylor, J.E. & Emmett, M.R. (2014). ‘What’s ‘cool’ in the world of green façades? How plant choice influences the cooling properties of green walls’, Building and Environment. 73 (0), pp. 198–207.
20. Carlet, F. (2015). ‘Understanding attitudes toward adoption of green infrastructure: A case study of US municipal officials’, Environmental Science & Policy. 51, pp. 65-76.
21. Chalmin-Pui, L.S., Roe, J., Griffiths, A., Smyth, N., Heaton, T., Clayden, A. & Cameron, R. (2021a). ‘“It made me feel brighter in myself” - The health and well-being impacts of a residential front garden horticultural intervention’, Landscape and Urban Planning. 205, 103958.
22. Chalmin-Pui, L.S., Griffiths, A., Roe, J., Heaton, T. & Cameron, R. (2021b). ‘Why garden? – Attitudes and the perceived health benefits of home gardening’, Cities. 112, 103118.
23. Christensen, R. (2023). ‘Ordinal Regression Models for Ordinal Data’, R package version 2023.12-4.1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal.
24. Chu, H.H. & Farrell, C. (2022). ‘Fast plants have water-use and drought strategies that balance rainfall retention and drought survival on green roofs’, Ecological Applications. 32 (1), e02486.
25. Cialdini, R.B. (2003). ‘Crafting normative messages to protect the environment’, Current Directions in Physiological Science. 12 (4), pp. 105-109.
26. Cilliers, S., Siebert, S., Davoren, E. & Lubbe, R. (2012). Social aspects of urban ecology in developing countries, with an emphasis on urban domestic gardens. In: Richter M, Weiland U (eds) Applied urban ecology: a global framework, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
27. de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I. & Schmidt, P. (2015). ‘Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions’, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 42, pp. 128-138.
28. del Carmen Redondo-Bermúdez, M., Gulenc. I.T., Cameron, R.W. & Inkson, B.J. (2021). ‘‘Green barriers’ for air pollutant capture: Leaf micromorphology as a mechanism to explain plants capacity to capture particulate matter’, Environmental Pollution, Volume 288, 117809
29. Derkzen, M.L., van Teeffelen, A.J.A. & Verburg, P.H. (2017). ‘Green infrastructure for urban climate adaption: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaption preferences?’, Landscape and Urban Planning. 157, pp. 106-130.
30. Doll, C., Rollins, C., Burton, M., Pannell, D., Rehdanz, K. & Meyerhoff, J. (2023). ‘Encouraging ecological landscape designs on underutilized urban lands: Homeowner preferences for verge conversion programs’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 87, 128049. Egerer, M.H., Lin, B.B., Threlfall, C.G. & Kendal, D. (2019). ‘Temperature variability influences urban garden plant richness and gardener water use behaviour, but not planting decisions’, Science of the Total Environment. 646, pp. 111-120.
31. Egerer, M., Annighöfer, P., Arzberger, S., Burger, S., Hecher, Y., Knill, V., Probst, B., Suda, M. (2024). ‘Urban oases: the social-ecological importance of small urban green spaces’, Ecosystems and People, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2315991
32. Fernández-Cañero, R., Ordovás, J. & Machuca, M.A.H. (2011). ‘Domestic gardens as water-wise landscapes: A case study in southwestern Europe’, Hort Technology. 21 (5), pp. 616-623.
33. Francis, R.A. (2018). ‘Artificial lawns: Environmental and societal considerations of an ecological simulacrum’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 30, pp. 152-156.
34. Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). ‘Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities’, Environmental Science & Policy Journal. 93, pp. 101–111.
35. Frick, J. Kaiser, F.G. & Wilson, M. (2004). ‘Environmental knowledge and conservation behaviour: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample’, Personality and Individual Differences. 37, pp. 1597-1613.
36. Frost, R. & Murtagh, N. (2024). ‘Understanding how we can encourage front gardening: Analysing capability and opportunity factors from nationally representative survey’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 96, 129364.
37. Gimenez, A., Ares, G., Chheang, S.L. & Jaeger, S.R. (2023). ‘Reduction in household food waste through an information strategy: Findings from consumers in Australia’, Food Quality and Preference. 111, 104982.
38. Gush, M.B., Blanuša, T., Chalmin‐Pui, L.S., Griffiths, A., Larsen, E.K., Prasad, R., Redmile‐Gordon, M. & Sutcliffe, C., (2024). ‘Environmental horticulture for domestic and community gardens—An integrated and applied research approach’. Plants, People, Planet, 6(2), pp.254-270.
39. Hanson, H.I., Eckberg, E., Widenberg, M. & Olsson, J.A. (2021). ‘Gardens’ contribution to people and urban green space’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 63, 127198.
40. Hartley, B.L., Thompson, R.C. & Pahl, S. (2015). ‘Marine litter education boosts children’s understanding and self-reported actions’, Marine Pollution Bulletin. 90, pp. 209-217.
41. Heim, A., Bradbury, C., Xie, G. & Lundholm, J. (2023). ‘Green roof plant traits: Influence of functional diversity on ecosystem services and coexistence’, Nature-Based Solutions. 4, 100091.
42. Hostetler, M. (2021). ‘Cues to care: future directions for ecological landscapes’, Urban Ecosystems. 24, pp. 11-19.
43. Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J. & Jorgensen, A. (2017b). ‘Attractive, climate-adapted and sustainable? Public perception of non-native planting in the designed urban landscape’, Landscape and Urban Planning. 164, pp. 49-63.
44. Huai, H., Xu, W., Wen, G. & Bai, W. (2011). ‘Comparison of the Homegardens of eight cultural groups in Jinping County, Southwest China’, Econ Bot 65(4):345–355
45. Ignatieva, M., Ahrné, K., Wissman, J., Eriksson, T., Tidåker, P., Hedblom, M., Kätterer, T., Marstorp, H., Berg, P., Eriksson, T. & Bengtsson, J. (2015). ‘Lawn as a cultural and ecological phenomenon: a conceptual framework for transdisciplinary research’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14, pp. 383–387.
46. IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
47. Jaganmohan, M., Vailshery, L.S., Gopal, D. & Nagendra, H. (2012). ‘Plant diversity and distribution in urban domestic gardens and apartments in Bangalore, India’, Urban Ecosyst 15:1–15. doi:10.1007/s11252-012-0244-5
48. Kaufman, A.J. & Lohr, V.I. (2004). ‘Does plant color affect emotional and physiological
responses to landscapes?’, Acta Horticulturae. 639, pp. 229-233.
49. Kemp, S., Hadley, P. & Blanuša, T. (2019). ‘The influence of plant type on green roof rainfall retention’, Urban Ecosystems. 22, pp. 355-366.
50. Kendal, D., Williams, K.J.H. & Williams, N.S.G. (2012). ‘Plant traits link people’s plant preferences to the composition of their gardens’, Landscape and Urban Planning. 105, pp. 34-42.
51. Kendon, E.J., Fischer, E.M. & Short, C.J. (2023). ‘Variability conceals emerging trend in 100yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes’, Nature Communications. 14, 1133.
52. Lange F., Hermans, Z., De Koster, J. & Smismans, R. (2022). ‘Promoting pro- environmental gardening practices: Field experimental evidence for the effectiveness of biospheric appeals’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 70, 127544.
53. Lerman, S.B., Larson, K.L., Narango, D.L., Goddard, M.A. & Marra, P.P. (2023). ‘Humanity for habitat: Residential yards as an opportunity for biodiversity conservation’, BioScience, 73(9), pp. 671-689.
54. Lewis, E., Phoenix, G.K., Alexander, P., David, J. &d Cameron, R.W. (2019). ‘Rewilding in the Garden: are garden hybrid plants (cultivars) less resilient to the effects of hydrological extremes than their parent species? A case study with Primula’, Urban Ecosystems, 22(5), pp.841-854.
55. Liu, P., Teng, M. & Han, C. (2020). ‘How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions’, Science of the Total Environment. 728, 138126.
56. Mackay, C.M.L. & Schmitt, M.T. (2019). ‘Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis’, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 65, 101323.
57. McLaughlin, C. (2024). ‘Maximising the environmental benefits of gardens through optimal planting choices and understanding occupants’ engagement’. [Doctoral thesis, University of Reading].CentAUR https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00121719
58. Minor, E., Belaire, J.A., Davis, A., Franco, M. & Lin, M. (2016). ‘Socioeconomics and neighbour mimicry drive yard and vegetation patterns’, In: Urban Landscape Ecology: Science, Policy and Practice. Francis, R.A., Millington, J.D.A. & Chadwick, M.A. (eds.). Earthscan from Routledge, pp. 56–74.
59. Neubig, C.M., Vranken, L., Roosen, J., Grasso, S., Hieke, S., Knoepfle, S., Macready, A.L. & Masento, N.A. (2020). ‘Action-related information trumps system information: Influencing consumers’ intention to reduce food waste’, Journal of Cleaner Production. 261, 121126.
60. Nur Hannah Ismail, S., Stovin, V. & Cameron, R.W.F. (2023). ‘Functional urban ground-cover plants: identifying traits that promote rainwater retention and dissipation’, Urban Ecosystems. 26, pp. 1709-1724.
61. O’Carroll, D.M., Sia, M.E., Staniec, M., Voogt, J.A., Lundholm, J.T., Smart, C.C. & Robinson, C.E. (2023). ‘Influence of vegetation type and climatological conditions on evapotranspiration from extensive green roofs’, Journal of Hydrology. 617, 128951.
62. Office for National Statistics (2023a). Education, England and Wales: Census 2021. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/educationandchildcare/bull etins/educationenglandandwales/census2021 (Accessed: 20 December 2023).
63. Office for National Statistics (2023b). Male and female populations. Available at: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by- ethnicity/demographics/male-and-female-populations/latest/ (Accessed: 20 December 2023).
64. Ondei, S., Price, O.F. & Bowman, D.M., (2024). ‘Garden design can reduce wildfire risk and drive more sustainable co-existence with wildfire’, npj Natural Hazards, 1(1), p.18.
65. Otto, S. & Pensini, P. (2017). ‘Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour’, Global Environmental Change. 47, pp. 88-94.
66. Peterson, M.N., Thurmond, B., Mchale, M., Rodriguez, S., Bondell, H.D. & Cook, M. (2012). ‘Predicting native plant landscaping preferences in urban areas’, Sustainable Cities and Society. 5, pp. 70–76.
67. Phillips, A., Da Schio, N., Canters, F. & Khan A.Z. (2023). ‘“A living street and not just green”: Exploring public preferences and concerns regarding nature- based solution implementation in urban streetscapes’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 86, 128034.
68. Pidgeon, N. (2012). ‘Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy’, Climate Policy. 12:sup01, S85-S106
69. Pulido Silva, M.T. (2008). ‘Home gardens as an alternative for sustainability: challenges and perspectives in Latin America’, Current Topics in Ethnobotany, 2008: 000-000 ISBN: 978-81-308-0243-5
70. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R- project.org/.
71. Royal Horticultural Society (2019). RHS Plants for Pollinators Garden plants. Available at: https://www.rhs.org.uk/science/pdf/conservation-and- biodiversity/wildlife/plants- for-pollinators-garden-plants.pdf (Accessed 25 October 2021).
72. Royal Horticultural Society (2021). Increasing the environmental resilience of UK gardens. RHS, London, UK.
73. Samus, A., Freeman, C., Dickinson, K.J.M. & van Heezik, Y. (2023). ‘An examination of the factors influencing engagement in gardening practices that support biodiversity using the theory of planned behavior’, Biological Conservation. 286, 110252.
74. Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2013). ‘Personally Relevant Climate Change: The Role of Place Attachment and Local Versus Global Message Framing in Engagement’, Environment and Behavior. 45 (1), pp. 60-85.
75. Shao, F., Wang, L., Sun, F., Li, G., Yu, L., Wang, Y., Zeng, X., Yan, H., Dong, L. & Bao, Z. (2019). ‘Study on different particulate matter retention capacities of the leaf surfaces of eight common garden plants in Hangzhou, China’, Science of the Total Environment. 652, pp. 939-951.
76. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N.F. (2011). ‘Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience’, Nature Climate Change, 1, DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1059.
77. Stobbelaar, D.J., van der Knapp, W. & Spijker, J. (2021). ‘Greening the City: How to Get Rid of Garden Pavement! The ‘Steenbreek’ Program as a Dutch Example’, Sustainability. 13, 3117.
78. Szota, C., Farrell, C., Williams, S.G., Arndt, S.K. & Fletcher, T.D. (2017). ‘Drought-avoiding plants with low water use can achieve high rainfall retention without jeopardising survival on green roofs’, Science of the Total Environment. 603-604, pp. 340-351.
79. Tomatis, F., Egerer, M., Correa-Guimaraes, A. & Navas-Gracia, L.M. (2023). ‘Urban gardening in a changing climate: A review of effects, responses and adaptation capacities for cities’, Agriculture, 13(2), p.502.
80. Toor, M. (2020). What is acquiescence bias and how can you stop it? Qualtrics, 3 December. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/avoiding-the-yes-bias/ (Accessed 12 February 2024).
81. Tsantopoulos, G., Varras, G., Chiotelli, E., Fotia, K. & Batou, M. (2018). ‘Public perceptions and attitudes toward green infrastructure on buildings: T The case of the metropolitan area of Athens, Greece’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 34, pp. 181-195.
82. van den Berg, A.E., & van Winsum-Westra, M. (2010). ‘Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9, pp. 179-186.
83. van Heezik, Y.M., Dickinson, K.J.M. & Freeman, C. (2012). ‘Closing the gap: communication to change gardening practices in support of native biodiversity in urban private gardens’, Ecology and Society. 17 (1), 34.
84. Wallington, J. (2022). No watering required: a drought-resistant garden for a changing climate. The Guardian, 19 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/aug/19/no-watering-required-a- drought-resistant-garden-for-a-changing-climate (Accessed 30 July 2024).
85. Wang, X., Zhou, Z., Xiang, Y., Peng, C. & Peng. C. (2024). ‘Effects of street plants on atmospheric particulate dispersion in urban streets: A review’, Environmental Reviews. 32(1): 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2023-0103
86. Warhurst, J.R., Parks, K.E., McCulloch, L. and Hudson, M.D., 2014. Front gardens to car parks: changes in garden permeability and effects on flood regulation. Science of the Total Environment, 485, pp.329-339.
87. Webster, E., Cameron, R.W.F. & Culham, A. (2017). ‘Gardening in a changing climate’, Royal Horticultural Society, UK.
88. Weerakkody, U., Dover, J.W., Mitchell, P. & Reiling, K. (2017). ‘Particulate Matter pollution capture by leaves of seventeen living wall species with special reference to rail-traffic at a metropolitan station’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 27, pp. 173-186.
89. Wiest, S.L., Raymond, L., Clawson, R.A. (2015). ‘Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change’, Global Environmental Change. 31, pp. 187–198.
90. Wong-Parodi, G. & Berlin Rubin, N. (2022). ‘Exploring how climate change subjective attribution, personal experience with extremes, concern, and subjective knowledge relate to pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions in the United States’, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 79, 101728.
91. Zhang, L., Dempsey, N. & Cameron, R. (2023). ‘Flowers – Sunshine for the soul! How does floral colour influence preference, feelings of relaxation and positive up-lift?’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 79, 127795.
92. Zhang, L., Dempsey, N. & Cameron, R., (2024). ‘‘Blossom Buddies’− How do flower colour combinations affect emotional response and influence therapeutic landscape design?’, Landscape and Urban Planning. 248, p.105099. University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
University of Reading
CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading
Accessibility navigation
Actionable information and climate change awareness drive consumer selection of environmentally beneficial garden plant
McLaughlin, C., Blanusa, T., Cameron, R. W.F., Lukac, M.
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Abstract/SummaryDomestic gardens worldwide cover approximately 15-30% of residential urban space and with the appropriate plant composition, have potential to help manage urban water flows, regulate temperatures and air-pollution. However, the provision of these regulating ecosystem services depends upon the preferences and willingness of private garden owners to adopt environmentally beneficial planting, with associated traits that confer these benefits. This study tested whether the way information on beneficial plant traits is presented influences taxa choices. In an experimental online survey, participants were divided into two groups: one received only ‘system information’ (basic facts about environmental problems: climate change, urban flooding, and poor air quality, n = 208), while the other also received ‘action-related information’ (how to potentially address environmental problems by choosing plants with certain traits, n = 211). Receiving ‘action-related information’ significantly influenced plant taxa selection; fewer choices were made for ornamental plants without traits that are beneficial for flood or pollution mitigation. Additionally, participants concerned about climate change were more willing to choose environmentally beneficial taxa, regardless of information group. These findings indicate that pro-environmental planting choices in domestic gardens can be encouraged by providing actionable information and linking to existing climate change concerns.
Deposit Details References University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
Lists
Lists
![[thumbnail of LUP paper McLauglin et al ACCEPTED.pdf]](https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png "LUP paper McLauglin et al ACCEPTED.pdf")