Challenging the logics of reformism and humanism in juvenile justice rhetoric

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cox, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-078X (2019) Challenging the logics of reformism and humanism in juvenile justice rhetoric. Critical Criminology, 27 (4). pp. 543-558. ISSN 1572-9877 doi: 10.1007/s10612-019-09474-4

Abstract/Summary

This article draws on contemporary policy discourse in order to advance claims about the intractable figure of the “bad” child in contemporary juvenile justice reforms in the United States (US). The article focuses in particular on the discourses of trauma and “brain science” to point to a form of neo-positivism that has arguably emerged and which challenges efforts to engage in systematic decarceration. The article also focuses on the idea of the “bad child” that persists in the commitment of some reformers to the necessity of confinement for some children. The article questions the extent to which new forms of positivism challenge our ability to leverage structural claims.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/125350
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s10612-019-09474-4
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record