Balancing legitimacies: efficiency, fairness and the transformation of parole oral hearings

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Phillips, J., Peplow, D., Oliver, C. and Purnell, C. (2025) Balancing legitimacies: efficiency, fairness and the transformation of parole oral hearings. British Journal of Criminology. ISSN 1464-3529 doi: 10.1093/bjc/azaf117

Abstract/Summary

This article examines the transformation of parole oral hearings in England and Wales following their shift to remote delivery. Drawing on qualitative interviews and hearing transcripts, it explores how remote hearings affect the legitimacy of parole, focusing on tensions between efficiency, fairness and participation. Using a framework of legitimacy underpinned by Suchman’s concept of procedural, consequential and pragmatic legitimacy, the article analyses how institutional efforts to reduce delay can simultaneously erode the fairness-based underpinnings of oral hearings. It argues that the rapid uptake of technology in response to crisis can produce lasting institutional change, often without sustained scrutiny or re-legitimation.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/127894
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/bjc/azaf117
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record