Pericles and the plumber: reigniting the debate of the purpose of legal education for the age of AI

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
ยท Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Barnes, V., Sunner, L. and Vessio, M. (2025) Pericles and the plumber: reigniting the debate of the purpose of legal education for the age of AI. Amicus Curiae, 7 (1). pp. 67-97. ISSN 2048-481X doi: 10.14296/ac.v7i1.5827

Abstract/Summary

Much is now being said in the wake of artificial intelligence (AI) about marking and assessments. This year represents the first year in which generative AI usage is considered by the scholarly community to be widespread. The article responds to the recent policy outlined by UCL Laws to introduce a return to traditional assessments, which preserve the integrity of a law degree. We place this debate within the wider context of law schools and what legal education ought to provide for society, more generally. Universities and law schools have different public mandates and should respond in accordance with their aims, community and identity.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128067
Identification Number/DOI 10.14296/ac.v7i1.5827
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher SAS Open Journals
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record