Socio-economic, structural, and policy drivers of agroforestry in Great Britain

[thumbnail of Manuscript_LUP_Areal et al.docx]
Text
- Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Areal, F. J., Remoundou, K., Clark, B., Shan, J., Fu, R., Eigenbrod, F., Lukac, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-6334, Teh, Y. A. and Frewer, L. J. (2026) Socio-economic, structural, and policy drivers of agroforestry in Great Britain. Land Use Policy, 165. 108008. ISSN 0264-8377 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108008

Abstract/Summary

Agroforestry (AF) is a critical solution for climate, biodiversity, and food security, yet its adoption is hindered by a lack of practice-specific evidence. This paper examines the factors influencing farmer adoption of eight AF practices in Great Britain. Survey data from 315 farmers, including a Best-Worst Scaling experiment, is analysed using a spatial multivariate ordered probit model. The analysis shows that farmer adoption intention is strongest for low-intensity practices (e.g., small woods, windbreaks) and weakest for integrated systems like silvoarable, silvopasture and agrosilvopasture with economic, structural, social, and policy factors exerting practice-specific influences. This evidence, alongside key farmer preferences for financial incentives and simplified regulations but against mandatory public access, points to stronger five-year adoption potential low-intensity AF options compared to more transformative, integrated practices. Consequently, effective strategies to increase AF adoption must be practice-specific, designed to address the distinct technical and perceptual barriers for each AF system. Effective policy should align incentives and communication with farmers characteristics. We show that a one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate; scaling up AF requires a dual strategy of practice-specific interventions, such as targeted financial support, and building market infrastructure for silvoarable, coupled with demographically-tailored outreach that aligns scheme communication with farmer identity, age, and location. We conclude that scaling up AF requires differentiated, evidence-based interventions tailored to both the specific AF practice and the farmer.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128629
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108008
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record