Identifying the multiple drivers of cactus diversification

Downloads

1. Arakaki, M. et al. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent plant lineages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8379–8384 (2011). 2. Hernández‐Hernández, T., Brown, J. W., Schlumpberger, B. O., Eguiarte, L. E. & Magallón, S. Beyond aridification: Multiple explanations for the elevated diversification of cacti in the new world succulent biome. N. Phytologist 202, 1382–1397 (2014). 3. Guerrero, P. C., Majure, L. C., Cornejo-Romero, A. & HernándezHernández, T. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary trends in the cactus family. J. Heredity 110, 4–21 (2019). 4. Gibson, A. C. & Nobel, P. S. The cactus primer. Harvard University Press (1986). 5. Nobel, P. S. Cacti biology and uses. University of California Press (2002). 6. Griffiths, H. & Males, J. Succulent plants. Curr. Biol. 27 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.021 (2017). 7. Pillet, M. et al. Elevated extinction risk of cacti under climate change. Nat. Plants 8, 366–372 (2022). 8. Magallón, S., Sánchez-Reyes, L. L. & Gómez-Acevedo, S. L. Thirty clues to the exceptional diversification of flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 123, 491–503 (2018). 9. Majure, L. C. et al. Phylogeny of Opuntia S.S. (Cactaceae): Clade delineation, geographic origins, and reticulate evolution. Am. J. Bot. 99, 847–864 (2012). 10. Thompson, J., Ramírez-Barahona, S., Priest, N. & Hernández-Hernández, T. Did succulents diversify in response to aridity? Evolutionary analyses of major succulent lineages around the world https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.23.541957 (2023). 11. Goettsch, B. et al. High proportion of cactus species threatened with extinction. Nat. Plants 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants. 2015.142 (2015). 12. Anderson, E. F., Brown, R. & Barthlott, W. The Cactus Family. Timber Press (2004). 13. Hernandez-Hernandez, T. et al. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae). Am. J. Bot. 98, 44–61 (2011). 14. Schlumpberger, B. O. A survey on pollination modes in cacti and a potential key innovation. Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships, 301–319 (2011). 15. Luebert, F., & Weigend, M. Phylogenetic insights into Andean plant diversification. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/ fevo.2014.00027 (2014). 16. Silva, G. A., Antonelli, A., Lendel, A., Moraes, Ede & Manfrin, M. H. The impact of early quaternary climate change on the diversification and population dynamics of a South American cactus species. J. Biogeogr. 45, 76–88 (2017). 17. Lopes, S. et al. Genome size variation in Cactaceae and its relationship with invasiveness and seed traits. Biol. Invasions 23, 3047–3062 (2021). 18. Ruedas, M., Valverde, T. & Zavala-Hurtado, J. A. Analysis of the factors that affect the distribution and abundance of three Neobuxbaumia species (Cactaceae) that differ in their degree of rarity. Acta Oecologica 29, 155–164 (2006). 19. Amaral, D., Bonatelli, I. A., Romeiro-Brito, M., Moraes, E. M. & Franco, F. F. Spatial Patterns of Evolutionary Diversity in Cactaceae Show Low Ecological Representation within Protected Areas https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.25.489403 (2022). 20. Valente, L. M. et al. Correlates of hyperdiversity in Southern African ice plants (Aizoaceae). Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 174, 110–129 (2013). 21. Igea, J. & Tanentzap, A. J. Angiosperm speciation cools down in the Tropics. Ecol. Lett. 23, 692–700 (2020). 22. Beaulieu, J. M. & O’Meara, B. C. Detecting hidden diversification shifts in models of trait-dependent speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 65, 583–601 (2016). 23. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. XGBoost. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 (2016). 24. Siqueira, A. C., Morais, R. A., Bellwood, D. R. & Cowman, P. F. Trophic innovations fuel reef fish diversification. Nat. Commun. 11 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16498-w (2020). 25. Bárcenas, R. T., Yesson, C. & Hawkins, J. A. Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae. Cladistics 27, 470–489 (2011). 26. Sánchez, D., Terrazas, T., Grego-Valencia, D. & Arias, S. Phylogeny in Echinocereus (Cactaceae) based on combined morphological and molecular evidence: Taxonomic implications. Syst. Biodivers. 16, 28–44 (2017). 27. Lavor, P., Calvente, A., Versieux, L. M. & Sanmartin, I. Bayesian spatio‐temporal reconstruction reveals rapid diversification and Pleistocene range expansion in the widespread columnar cactus Pilosocereus. J. Biogeogr. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi. 13481 (2018). 28. Rabosky, D. L. Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversity-dependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS ONE 9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089543 (2014). Article https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51666-2 Nature Communications | (2024) 15:7282 8 29. FitzJohn, R. G. Quantitative traits and diversification. Syst. Biol. 59, 619–633 (2010). 30. von Willert, D. J., Brinckmann, E., Eller, B. M., Ihlenfeldt, H.-D. & Werger, M. J. A. Life strategies of succulents in deserts: With special reference to the Namib Desert. Cambridge University Press (1992). 31. Nobel, P. S. Surface temperatures of cacti–influences of environmental and morphological factors. Ecology 59, 986–995 (1978). 32. Godínez–Álvarez, H., Valverde, T. & Ortega–Baes, P. Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. Botanical Rev. 69, 173–203 (2003). 33. Gurvich, D. E. et al. Combined effect of water potential and temperature on seed germination and seedling development of cacti from a mesic Argentine ecosystem. Flora 227, 18–24 (2017). 34. Nuzhyna, N., Baglay, K., Golubenko, A. & Lushchak, O. Anatomically distinct representatives of Cactaceae Juss. family have different response to acute heat shock stress. Flora 242, 137–145 (2018). 35. Andrade, J. L. & Nobel, P. S. Microhabitats and water relations of epiphytic cacti and ferns in a lowland Neotropical forest. Biotropica 29, 261–270 (1997). 36. Aragón-Gastélum, J. L. et al. Induced climate change impairs photosynthetic performance in Echinocactus platyacanthus, an especially protected Mexican cactus species. Flora - Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 209, 499–503 (2014). 37. Seal, C. E. et al. Thermal buffering capacity of the germination phenotype across the environmental envelope of the Cactaceae. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5309–5317 (2017). 38. Benavides, E., Breceda, A. & Anadón, J. D. Winners and losers in the predicted impact of climate change on cacti species in Baja California. Plant Ecol. 222, 29–44 (2020). 39. Araújo, M. B. et al. Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1206–1219 (2013). 40. Pyron, R. A., Costa, G. C., Patten, M. A. & Burbrink, F. T. Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation. Biol. Rev. 90, 1248–1262 (2014). 41. Moro, M. F. et al. The role of edaphic environment and climate in structuring phylogenetic pattern in seasonally dry tropical plant communities. PLoS ONE 10 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0119166 (2015). 42. Hulshof, C. M. & Spasojevic, M. J. The edaphic control of plant diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1634–1650 (2020). 43. Buira, A., Fernández‐Mazuecos, M., Aedo, C. & Molina‐Venegas, R. The contribution of the edaphic factor as a driver of recent plant diversification in a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot. J. Ecol. 109, 987–999 (2020). 44. Rajakaruna, N. Lessons on evolution from the study of edaphic specialization. Botanical Rev. 84, 39–78 (2017). 45. Rajakaruna, N. The edaphic factor in the origin of plant species. Int. Geol. Rev. 46, 471–478 (2004). 46. Ribeiro-Silva, S., Medeiros, M. B., Lima, V. V., Peixoto, M. R. & Aona, L. Y. Patterns of Cactaceae species distribution in a protected area in the semiarid Caatinga biome of north-eastern Brazil. Edinb. J. Bot. 73, 157–170 (2016). 47. Pachepsky, Ya. A., Timlin, D. J. & Rawls, W. J. Soil water retention as related to topographic variables. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1787–1795 (2001). 48. Huang, J. & Hartemink, A. E. Soil and environmental issues in sandy soils. Earth-Sci. Rev. 208, 103295 (2020). p. 49. Westoby, M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199, 213–227 (1998). 50. Boucher, F. C., Verboom, G. A., Musker, S. & Ellis, A. G. Plant size: A key determinant of diversification? N. Phytologist 216, 24–31 (2017). 51. Igea, J., Miller, E. F., Papadopulos, A. S. & Tanentzap, A. J. Seed size and its rate of evolution correlate with species diversification across angiosperms. PLoS Biol. 15 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.2002792 (2017). 52. Feldman, A., Sabath, N., Pyron, R. A., Mayrose, I. & Meiri, S. Body sizes and diversification rates of lizards, snakes, Amphisbaenians and the tuatara. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 187–197 (2015). 53. Boucher, F. C., Quatela, A.-S., Ellis, A. G. & Verboom, G. A. (2020). Diversification rate vs. diversification density: Decoupled consequences of plant height for diversification of Alooideae in time and space. PLoS ONE, 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0233597 54. Cooney, C. R. & Thomas, G. H. Heterogeneous relationships between rates of speciation and body size evolution across vertebrate clades. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 5, 101–110 (2021). 55. Gascoigne, J., Berec, L., Gregory, S. & Courchamp, F. Dangerously few liaisons: a review of mate‐finding Allee Effects. Popul. Ecol. 51, 355–372 (2009). 56. Xu S., Schlüter P. M. & Schiestl F. P. (2012). Pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Int. J. Ecol. https://doi. org/10.1155/2012/285081 57. Smith, C. I. et al. Pattern and timing of diversification in Yucca (Agavaceae): Specialized pollination does not escalate rates of diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 275, 249–258 (2007). 58. Fleming, T. H., Geiselman, C. & Kress, W. J. The evolution of bat pollination: A phylogenetic perspective. Ann. Bot. 104, 1017–1043 (2009). 59. Levin, S. A., Muller-Landau, H. C., Nathan, R. & Chave, J. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol., Evolution, Syst. 34, 575–604 (2003). 60. Lengyel, S., Gove, A. D., Latimer, A. M., Majer, J. D. & Dunn, R. R. Ants sow the seeds of global diversification in flowering plants. PLoS ONE 4, e5480 (2009). 61. Majure, L. C. et al. Pleistocene aridification underlies the evolutionary history of the Caribbean endemic, insular, giant Consolea (Opuntioideae). Am. J. Bot. 108, 200–215 (2021). 62. Merklinger, F. F. et al. Quaternary diversification of a columnar cactus in the driest place on Earth. Am. J. Bot. 108, 184–199 (2021). 63. Thompson, J. B., Davis, K. E., Dodd, H. O., Wills, M. A. & Priest, N. K. Speciation across the Earth driven by global cooling in terrestrial orchids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2102408120 (2023b). 64. Rabosky, D. L. et al. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559, 392–395 (2018). 65. Tietje, M. et al. Global variation in diversification rate and species richness are unlinked in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 2120662119 (2022). 66. Feeley, K. J. & Stroud, J. T. Where on Earth are the “Tropics”? Frontiers of Biogeography, 10 https://doi.org/10.21425/ f5fbg38649 (2018). 67. Sheth, S. N., Morueta‐Holme, N. & Angert, A. L. Determinants of geographic range size in plants. N. Phytologist 226, 650–665 (2020). 68. Hernández-Hernández, T. & Wiens, J. J. Why are there so many flowering plants? A multiscale analysis of plant diversification. Am. Naturalist 195, 948–963 (2020). 69. Gaston, K. J. & Fuller, R. A. The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1–9 (2009). 70. Leão, T. C., Fonseca, C. R., Peres, C. A. & Tabarelli, M. Predicting extinction risk of Brazilian Atlantic Forest angiosperms. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1349–1359 (2014). 71. Birand, A., Vose, A. & Gavrilets, S. Patterns of species ranges, speciation, and extinction. Am. Naturalist 179, 1–21 (2012). 72. Cardillo, M., Huxtable, J. S. & Bromham, L. Geographic range size, life history and rates of diversification in Australian mammals. J. Evolut. Biol. 16, 282–288 (2003). Article https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51666-2 Nature Communications | (2024) 15:7282 9 73. Hay, E. M., McGee, M. D. & Chown, S. L. Geographic range size and speciation in honeyeaters. BMC Ecol. Evol. 22 https://doi.org/10. 1186/s12862-022-02041-6 (2022). 74. Leão, T. C., Lughadha, E. N. & Reich, P. B. Evolutionary patterns in the geographic range size of Atlantic Forest Plants. Ecography 43, 1510–1520 (2020). 75. Johnson, M. G. et al. A universal probe set for targeted sequencing of 353 nuclear genes from any flowering plant designed using K-medoids clustering. Syst. Biol. 68, 594–606 (2018). 76. Romeiro-Brito, M., Telhe, M. C., Amaral, D. T., Franco, F. F. & Moraes, E. M. A target capture probe set useful for deep- and shallow-level phylogenetic studies in Cactaceae. Genes 13, 707 (2022). 77. Meyer, A. L. & Wiens, J. J. Estimating diversification rates for higher taxa: BAMM can give problematic estimates of rates and rate shifts. Evolution 72, 39–53 (2018). 78. Maliet, O., Hartig, F. & Morlon, H. A model with many small shifts for estimating species-specific diversification rates. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 3, 1086–1092 (2019). 79. Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and Time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012). 80. Title, P. O. & Rabosky, D. L. Tip rates, phylogenies and diversification: What are we estimating, and how good are the estimates? Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 821–834 (2019). 81. Louca, S. & Pennell, M. W. Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580, 502–505 (2020). 82. Franco, F. F. et al. Evolutionary genetics of cacti: Research biases, advances and prospects. Genes 13, 452 (2022). 83. Majure, L. C., Baker, M. A., Cloud‐Hughes, M., Salywon, A. & Neubig, K. M. Phylogenomics in Cactaceae: A case study using the chollas sensu lato (Cylindropuntieae, Opuntioideae) reveals a common pattern out of the Chihuahuan and Sonoran deserts. Am. J. Bot. 106, 1327–1345 (2019). 84. Franco, F. F. et al. Plio-Pleistocene diversification of Cereus (Cactaceae, Cereeae) and closely allied genera. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 183, 199–210 (2017). 85. Bombonato, J. R. et al. The potential of genome-wide RAD sequences for resolving rapid radiations: A case study in Cactaceae. Mol. Phylogenetics Evolution 151, 106896 (2020). 86. Aquino, D., Moreno‐Letelier, A., González‐Botello, M. A. & Arias, S. The importance of environmental conditions in maintaining lineage identity in Epithelantha (Cactaceae). Ecol. Evolution 11, 4520–4531 (2021). 87. Amaral, D. T. et al. Tracking the xeric biomes of South America: the spatiotemporal diversification of Mandacaru Cactus. J. Biogeogr. 48, 3085–3103 (2021). 88. Bouchenak‐Khelladi, Y., Onstein, R., Xing, Y., Schwery, O. & Linder, H. On the complexity of triggering evolutionary radiations. N. Phytologist 207, 313–326 (2015). 89. Donoghue, M. J. & Sanderson, M. J. Confluence, synnovation, and depauperons in plant diversification. N. Phytologist 207, 260–274 (2015). 90. Drori, M. et al. OneTwoTree: An online tool for Phylogeny Reconstruction. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 1492–1499 (2018). 91. Hunt, D. CITES Cactaceae Checklist. Royal Botanic Gardens (2016). 92. Katoh, K. & Frith, M. C. Adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment using MAFFT and last. Bioinformatics 28, 3144–3146 (2012). 93. Gouy, M., Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. Seaview version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Building. Mol. Biol. Evolution 27, 221–224 (2009). 94. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. Trimal: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009). 95. Borowiec, M. L. AMAS: a fast tool for alignment manipulation and computing of summary statistics. PeerJ 4, e1660 (2016). 96. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014). 97. Smith, S. A. & O’Meara, B. C. TreePL: Divergence time estimation using penalized likelihood for large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 28, 2689–2690 (2012). 98. Ramírez-Barahona, S., Sauquet, H. & Magallón, S. The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 4, 1232–1238 (2020). 99. Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolut. Biol. 7, 214 (2007). 100. QGIS Association. QGIS—A Free and Open Source Geographic Information System. QGIS Geographic Information System https://qgis.org/ (2020). 101. McKinney, W. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in python. Proc. 9th Python Sci. Conf. 445, 51–56 (2010). 102. Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020). 103. Waskom, M. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3021 (2021). 104. Hughes, A. et al. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography, 44 https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159419540. 02222358 (2021). 105. Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth’s Land Surface Areas. Scientific Data 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/ sdata.2017.122 (2017). 106. Amatulli, G. et al. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Sci. Data 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.40 (2018). 107. Poggio, L. et al. Soilgrids 2.0: Producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7, 217–240 (2021). 108. Guan, W. W. et al. WorldMap – A geospatial framework for collaborative research. Ann. GIS 18, 121–134 (2012). 109. Dauby, G. et al. ConR: An R package to assist large‐scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data. Ecol. Evol. 7, 11292–11303 (2017). 110. Rice, A. et al. The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) – a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. N. Phytol. 206, 19–26 (2014). 111. Wei, T. et al. Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician 56, e24 (2017). 112. Rabosky, D. L. et al. BAMMtools: An R package for the analysis of evolutionary dynamics on phylogenetic trees. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 701–707 (2014). 113. Plummer, M., Best, N. & Vines, K. CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R. N. 6, 7–11 (2006). 114. FitzJohn, R. G. Diversitree: Comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods Ecol. Evolution 3, 1084–1092 (2012).