Accessibility navigation

Mediating punitiveness: understanding public attitudes towards work-related fatality cases

Almond, P. J. ORCID: and Colover, S. (2010) Mediating punitiveness: understanding public attitudes towards work-related fatality cases. European Journal of Criminology, 7 (5). pp. 323-338. ISSN 1741-2609

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/1477370810373728


This paper concerns an empirical investigation into public attitudes towards work-related fatality cases, where organizational offenders cause the death of workers or members of the public. This issue is particularly relevant following the introduction of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 into UK law. Here, as elsewhere, the use of criminal law against companies reflects governmental concerns over public confidence in the law’s ability to regulate risk. The empirical findings demonstrate that high levels of public concern over these cases do not translate into punitive attitudes. Such cases are viewed rationally and constructively, and lead to instrumental rather than purely expressive enforcement preferences.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:16654


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation