Downloads

Brown, J. & Cunningham, S. 2007. A history of ACM Siggraph. Communications of the ACM Archive, 50: 54-61. Christensen, C. M. 2000. The innovator's dilemma. New York: Harper Business. DTI. 2000. UK business potential for virtual reality, a market survey conducted by Cydata Limited on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962-1023. Friedman, A. L. 1994. The information technology field: Using fields and paradigms for analysing technological change. Human Relations, 47: 367-392. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of sun microsystems and java. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 196-214. Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32: 277-300. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. 2000. To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7: 329-348. Granqvist, N. 2007. Nanotechnology and nanolabeling : Essays on the emergence of new technological fields. HSI, Helsinki. Griffith, T. L. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24: 472-488. Howard, T. L. J., Hubbold, R. J., Murta, A. D., & West, A. J. 1995. 1995 survey of virtual reality activity in the uk: The Advanced Interfaces Group, SIMA Report. Hughes, T., P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press. Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17: 251-267. Munir, K. & Phillips, N. 2005. The birth of the kodak moment: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26: 1665-1687. Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3: 398-427. Orlikowski, W. J. & Barley, S. R. 2001. Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25: 145-165. Pettigrew, A. M. 1985. Contextualist research and the study of organizational change process. In E. Mumford & R. Hirschheim & G. Fitzgerald & A. T. Wood-Harper (Eds.), Research methods in information systems: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 colloquium: 53-78. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: New Holland. Scott, R. W. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Swann, G. M. P. & Watts, T. P. 2000. Visualisation needs vision: The pre-paradigmatic character of virtual reality. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? - technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. Watts, T., Swann, G. M. P., & Pandit, N. R. 1998. Virtual reality and innovation potential. Business Strategy Review, 9: 45-54. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage Publications. Whyte, J. K. 2002. Virtual reality and the built environment. Oxford: Architectural Press. Whyte, J. K. 2003. Innovation and users: Virtual reality in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics (CM&E), 21: 565 - 572. Woodward, J. 1980 [1965]. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.